Pilgrims' Patter

The Forum => The B-Ark => Topic started by: spannerman on January 10, 2011, 10:03:15 PM

Title: crawley
Post by: spannerman on January 10, 2011, 10:03:15 PM
Just watched the cheats team beat derby 2-1  , he really is a fat b?????d ??? ???
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: sparks on January 10, 2011, 10:22:05 PM
Just watched the cheats team beat derby 2-1  , he really is a fat b?????d ??? ???
.


 Reminds me of 'The Pilsbury Dough Boy' what a horrible little man.... great strike to win
 the tie though....... >:(
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Pride of Lincolnshire on January 10, 2011, 10:31:19 PM
Looks like on the 29th I'm going to be a Torquay fan for the day.
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: kingofnaves on January 10, 2011, 10:36:12 PM
Evans will be a Posh by then!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: wez33 on January 10, 2011, 10:36:49 PM
good for them
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Swineshead Pilgrim on January 10, 2011, 10:39:18 PM
i had a massive dilemma tonight. Being a full time Boston fan and a part time Forest fan, it took me a few minutes to work out who I wanted to lose more. Crawley won that argument.

Got a bit angry with Steve Claridge earlier, he said Evans is doing great at Crawley and it's no surprise as he tasted success at Boston. IT'S NOT BECAUSE HE'S A GOOD MANAGER YOU TWUNT CLARIDGE!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Pete Brooksbank on January 10, 2011, 10:45:53 PM
Same here. I'm a part-time Forest fan and I'd have gladly seen Derby through, because the media keep reporting this as a non-league success story. Much like they did with us. Idiots. Ah well - suppose it's not really our problem any more, I just hate seeing the smug look on that cock-end's face....
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: kingofnaves on January 10, 2011, 10:47:16 PM
Who invented the widescreen TV? Luckily Evans just fitted on mine!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: BUFC Loyal on January 10, 2011, 11:03:46 PM
hopefully those crawley fans enjoy nights tonight while they last cos as we full well know they will quickly turn into dark days, very dark days indeed

also if capello aint careful evans is gonna take his job off him after all thse upsets !
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: YellowHills on January 11, 2011, 01:51:37 AM
Evans is nothing more than a creepy, tax dodging, fat Scottis bastard!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Shoddys Lane on January 11, 2011, 09:44:47 AM
Quick warning - if you have access to Sky Sports News, don't turn it on today unless you want to be confronted by the grinning visage of the evil Evans....
He was also on Radio 4 this morning. They then innocently followed his interview with a piece about financial propriety in football – genius!  ::)

Title: Re: crawley
Post by: travelling man on January 11, 2011, 12:43:43 PM
Fit and proper person in football? I am sooooo pleased the FA don`t back down on their rules.
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Oakham Pilgrim on January 11, 2011, 01:38:33 PM
I'm a part-time Derby fan, and if Forest had been playing Crawley last night I would have wanted them to win. I couldn't believe what Claridge said on Radio 5 last night about Evans knowing what it took to get out of the Conference. I immediately sent an email to the programme which was not, of course, read out. You can imagine the message: that he only got BUFC into the league by fraud, for which he was subsequently convicted; that he had brought one of the most respected non-league clubs to its knees morally and financially, and trashed its reputation; that no self-respecting club should ever let him near. I don't think Evans' chequered (and that's putting it mildly) past was ever mentioned. Very poor, Radio 5.
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: father Ted on January 11, 2011, 03:32:42 PM
Listened to R5s free and easy  coverage last night . . didn't they say the last time Derby were knocked out by a non -league club was 1955 and someone not us ??
 Thought it was us a few yrs after that .
   Think Derby should face up to not getting where they want to be while Clough Jnr is in charge .
     Maybe his replacement at Burton could do better .
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on January 11, 2011, 06:12:03 PM
Listened to R5s free and easy  coverage last night . . didn't they say the last time Derby were knocked out by a non -league club was 1955 and someone not us ??
 Thought it was us a few yrs after that .
   Think Derby should face up to not getting where they want to be while Clough Jnr is in charge .
     Maybe his replacement at Burton could do better .

I pointed that out on email to them but they didn't correct themselves.  Turned it off at 1-1 when Claridge described them as prudent in the transfer market, clown.
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Oakham Pilgrim on January 11, 2011, 06:59:37 PM
...... and what made Radio 5's coverage even more sickening was the way Mark Chapman was fawning over Evans after the final whistle - I think he even called him 'gracious' for thanking 5 for being there.  Ugh!!!

Hope I don't sound bitter and twisted!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: cappo on January 12, 2011, 10:15:05 AM
ye it all sticks in the throat a bit dont it.i listened to evens being interveiwed by mike parry on talk sport and it really pissed me of and to be honest i like to think im one of ours that has moved on and doesnt give a toss about him anymore,i was obviously wrong  :-\
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Stumpy on January 12, 2011, 03:00:02 PM
At least some reporters have not completely forgotten the past.

telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/fa-cup/8252766/Are-Crawley-Town-the-least-popular-non-league-FA-Cup-giant-killers-ever.html)

Makes you wonder if the further this cup run goes and his projct promotion materialises then the more the truth will come back to haunt him.
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Myleftfoot on January 13, 2011, 12:20:46 AM
Nice find Stumpy. Some interesting links to the story too. It seems a fella called Stephen Evans was Appointed as director on 27 Jul 2010 of  Prospect Estate Holdings Ltd.

Prospect Estate Holdings Ltd, the company which own the club. Cosy!  :o

I don't think much to their registered address, not very glamorous  1 SHANDYS CLOSE, HORSHAM WEST SUSSEX better than on Wormgate though!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on January 13, 2011, 08:17:46 AM
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_vmOvOwYYz8E/TFg5x1gFWcI/AAAAAAAAAGc/7wl0329mqYk/s200/fingers+in+pies.jpg)

Unsackable?
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on January 13, 2011, 08:18:33 AM
Or did they get bought out on the 28th, £££££££££££££££
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Fairfax on January 13, 2011, 10:23:16 AM
From the Crawley Observer, published on Tue Apr 01 2008.

The company that has taken over Crawley Town are Boston-based Prospect Estates Holdings Ltd.
The Lincolnshire firm, officially registered only today, now control the Reds' purse strings.
Manager Steve Evans has firm links with Boston after guiding them to the conference title in 2002.
Speculation had linked both Evans and other Boston money-men Jon Sotnick to the buy-out deal. A claim strenuously denied by the Crawley manager and the club.

and, eight days later...

Former Boston United money man Justin Rushworth helped set up the Crawley Town consortium, the Observer can reveal.
Rushworth was club accountant at the Lincolnshire club and also
brokered the deal between Boston FC and holding company Lavaflow shortly before Reds' boss Steve Evans became manager.
But Evans insists the man who used to control the purse strings at his old club is simply an accountant who helped open Prospect Estates Holdings Ltd last week.
The Observer understands that Evans put Jarman in touch with Rushworth
after the SA Group set a Tuesday deadline to have rid of the club.
Evans said: "Phil Jarman was responsible for setting up a holding company for the shares and decided he didn't want to use previous accountants and asked us if we knew anybody who could form a base.
"He's (Justin) got nothing to do with it. He's got about 300 businesses that he's opened for people, that's what he does.
"People will find that Prospect Estates will be coming to Sussex in a few weeks and it's not going to be remaining in Boston."
He added: "Justin is just an accountant like any other accountant.
"There is no connection with Boston United."
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: kingofnaves on January 13, 2011, 12:17:12 PM
I think the company was registered in a shitty looking building next to the old Boston Divers place down High Street ( 78?)
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Pilgrim86 on January 13, 2011, 12:37:20 PM
Even the latest "I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue" was recorded in Crawley :(
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: howmanynames2pick on January 13, 2011, 01:19:18 PM
"There is no connection with Boston United."
Is probably the best line troughout this thread
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Oakham Pilgrim on January 13, 2011, 02:17:51 PM
I'm not an expert on companies, but looking at Prospects Holdings records, there are only two directors, Evans and Jarman - the other two listed left as Evans started in July last year. Anybody better than me at understanding this?
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: oxo on January 13, 2011, 05:11:04 PM
For crying out bloody loud here we go again tainting this forum with that shithouse and his carryings on.
I thought we had left him and all his crap in the past but alas here we go again. It is time any talk of him and Creepy was banned from here.
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Fairfax on January 13, 2011, 05:53:49 PM
Although we seem to upset some people by referring to past happenings, it's part of our history.

If the Scots can still go on about Bannockburn after all this time, I don't see why we should forgive or forget a major happening in our recent history. We might as well forget about Wembley 85, 6-1 against Derby, or Jim Smith and co.

It would appear that there are sufficient people who still wish to comment, and the title of this posting gives a very strong clue to its content.

If you're not interested, why bother to read it?
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: green hats mate on January 13, 2011, 08:20:40 PM
Well put Fairfax .   Each time it is mentioned is a timely reminder to us all of how lucky we are to have suvived the scum  ( thanks to Chestnuts )
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Myleftfoot on January 13, 2011, 10:07:05 PM
I'm not an expert on companies, but looking at Prospects Holdings records, there are only two directors, Evans and Jarman - the other two listed left as Evans started in July last year. Anybody better than me at understanding this?





MR STEPHEN EVANS Appointed as director on 27 Jul 2010 (Document)
VICTOR MARLEY Appointment terminated as director on 26 Jul 2010 (Document)
THOMAS SCOTT Appointment terminated as director on 26 Jul 2010 (Document)
THOMAS ANDERSON SCOTT Appointed as director on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
VICTOR BARRY MARLEY Appointed as director on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
PHILIP MICHAEL JARMAN Appointed as director and secretary on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
Information last updated: 16 Dec 2010


Correct
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Pride of Lincolnshire on January 13, 2011, 10:16:13 PM
I see some would still rather chat about that fat moron down south than the game on Tuesday. Look how few people commented on our win on Tuesday night compared to this thread on evan$. I aint forgot what that poisonous rat did to our club, but you don't see me constantly perving over every move of his and giving updates on what he's got in his shopping trolley. It's become an unhealthy obsession for some BUFC fans. I'd like to think that I can move forward, like the club has, without having to wade through the dirt, again and again.
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Fairfax on January 13, 2011, 10:30:18 PM
I think that you will find that the postings are in direct proportion to the current success of Crawley Town Football Club. The resulting press coverage shows that the media have forgotten, or chosen to ignore the history and background of their manager and his associates.

For evil to succeed, it needs only that the just stay silent.  Lest we forget!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: kingofnaves on January 13, 2011, 10:38:04 PM
Scott! Father in law?
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: kingofnaves on January 13, 2011, 10:38:56 PM
Why don't we ask Roo to do some investigating!
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Wembley 85 on January 14, 2011, 08:37:27 AM
If the Scots can still go on about Bannockburn after all this time, I don't see why we should forgive or forget a major happening in our recent history. We might as well forget about Wembley 85, 6-1 against Derby, or Jim Smith and co.


Please don't forget about me. sniff, sob.   :'(
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: dubai camel on January 15, 2011, 11:22:08 AM
Never forget the about the fat cheat.

Had a friend who I had told all about the fat one, who saw and heard him for the first time on TV this week - he was shocked that he lived up to my billing and more .....
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: dazzybabie on January 15, 2011, 12:03:03 PM
I'm not an expert on companies, but looking at Prospects Holdings records, there are only two directors, Evans and Jarman - the other two listed left as Evans started in July last year. Anybody better than me at understanding this?





MR STEPHEN EVANS Appointed as director on 27 Jul 2010 (Document)
VICTOR MARLEY Appointment terminated as director on 26 Jul 2010 (Document)
THOMAS SCOTT Appointment terminated as director on 26 Jul 2010 (Document)
THOMAS ANDERSON SCOTT Appointed as director on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
VICTOR BARRY MARLEY Appointed as director on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
PHILIP MICHAEL JARMAN Appointed as director and secretary on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
Information last updated: 16 Dec 2010


Correct

I am a simple man of simple mind and i dont really understand all this buisiness lingo. So can i ask a couple of questions. This proepect thingy seems to have started off in boston. Does this mean it could be something left over from when the fat one was in boston and he has blown the dust of it, or because of the changes in directors could it be something he has bought into.

Also why do they need a "holding" company to have the shares and stuff? surely the club sells the shares to interested parties. if the club sells shares to a holding company that it owns, then wouldnt that mean that the club would end up being controlled by the holding company? this seems like some backdoor way of selling a club.

Could it alos be and god forgive me for saying this that fatty has learnt his lesson and is either very lucky to have a money tree, or is bending the system another way.

and finally, does this reflect what he did at boston in any way?

too many questions, but im interested to hear the answers if you dont mind more talk of him whose name we dont mention...

Daz
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Johnny Pilgrim on January 15, 2011, 12:04:25 PM
...........IMO   ALL  posts about  Ev@ns should be removed/banned.........Its far better to talk about OUR club,and what we are doing than somebody elses club and manager.......Crawley are what they are-they are flying the flag for the non-league in the FA cup and also attracting a lot of media interest to this level of football.........as for Ev@ns himself most of us thought he could walk on water until he revealed his true colours.........its the Football Authorities who should being hanging their heads in shame for allowing people like him to still be involved in football........So why dont WE ALL MOVE ON PLEASE AND TALK GOOD THINGS ABOUT OUR CLUB......rant over......
Title: Re: crawley
Post by: dubai camel on January 16, 2011, 05:37:56 AM
Lest We Forget .....

Don't click the link if you don't want to read about the Fat One.

People like him would love us to forget about his past, likewise the FA. His past should haunt him wherever he goes, our club continues to pay the heavy price for his actions, so what he did then is as relevant today as it has ever been.



Title: Re: crawley
Post by: Myleftfoot on January 17, 2011, 09:23:57 AM
I'm not an expert on companies, but looking at Prospects Holdings records, there are only two directors, Evans and Jarman - the other two listed left as Evans started in July last year. Anybody better than me at understanding this?





MR STEPHEN EVANS Appointed as director on 27 Jul 2010 (Document)
VICTOR MARLEY Appointment terminated as director on 26 Jul 2010 (Document)
THOMAS SCOTT Appointment terminated as director on 26 Jul 2010 (Document)
THOMAS ANDERSON SCOTT Appointed as director on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
VICTOR BARRY MARLEY Appointed as director on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
PHILIP MICHAEL JARMAN Appointed as director and secretary on 17 Apr 2008 (Document)
Information last updated: 16 Dec 2010


Correct

I am a simple man of simple mind and i dont really understand all this buisiness lingo. So can i ask a couple of questions. This proepect thingy seems to have started off in boston. Does this mean it could be something left over from when the fat one was in boston and he has blown the dust of it, or because of the changes in directors could it be something he has bought into.

Also why do they need a "holding" company to have the shares and stuff? surely the club sells the shares to interested parties. if the club sells shares to a holding company that it owns, then wouldnt that mean that the club would end up being controlled by the holding company? this seems like some backdoor way of selling a club.

Could it alos be and god forgive me for saying this that fatty has learnt his lesson and is either very lucky to have a money tree, or is bending the system another way.

and finally, does this reflect what he did at boston in any way?

too many questions, but im interested to hear the answers if you dont mind more talk of him whose name we dont mention...

Daz














Try a search engine  :)