Author Topic: Conspiracy Theory  (Read 3723 times)

Dipdodah

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1975
    • View Profile
Conspiracy Theory
« on: April 20, 2016, 11:21:39 AM »
Once again it's my annual conspiracy theory.

What is the betting that we win Saturday, win the following week, but Nuneaton on appeal get their 3 points back. >:(
The older I get, the earlier it gets late

qwerty

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
    • View Profile
Re: Conspiracy Theory
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2016, 12:05:34 PM »
15/2

Dipdodah

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1975
    • View Profile
Re: Conspiracy Theory
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2016, 12:36:22 PM »
I'll have a tenner at that price ;)
The older I get, the earlier it gets late

Cavalier

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1645
    • View Profile
Re: Conspiracy Theory
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2016, 01:42:17 PM »
We must go all out for the win on Sat and treat it like a cup final.  A draw may not be enough as, without those deducted points, Nuneaton will only need another win and draw to make 5th.
United we stand..................

The Third Twin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1447
    • View Profile
Re: Conspiracy Theory
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2016, 05:52:41 PM »
Once again it's my annual conspiracy theory.

What is the betting that we win Saturday, win the following week, but Nuneaton on appeal get their 3 points back. >:(

a) we should appeal the appeal
b) if the league is undecided, then we should have a one off pre-playoff game at a neutral venue.
c) if all else fails, we could set up a wrestling ring and have an 11 a side tag match with the last man standings team progressing to Wrestlemania and the play-off final. My money's on Pidge
« Last Edit: April 20, 2016, 09:42:52 PM by The (no longer evil) Good Twin »
He who would valiant be , 'gainst all disaster.
Let him in constancy follow the master.
There's no discouragement shall make him once relent
His first avowed intent, to be a Pilgrim.

John Bunyan, 1684

hozzer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: Conspiracy Theory
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2016, 08:07:24 PM »
Nuneaton docked 6 points in February 2012 for playing an ineligible player twice.

Nuneaton docked 3 points in February 2015 for playing ineligible player.

Nuneaton docked 3 points in February 2016 for playing ineligible player.

Anyone see a pattern, should have been more than 3 points as its clearly not the first time and always in February, how strange.
against league 3, an idiots guide to making the rich richer and the poor poorer.

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: Conspiracy Theory
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2016, 08:46:15 PM »
Nuneaton docked 6 points in February 2012 for playing an ineligible player twice.

Nuneaton docked 3 points in February 2015 for playing ineligible player.

Nuneaton docked 3 points in February 2016 for playing ineligible player.

Anyone see a pattern, should have been more than 3 points as its clearly not the first time and always in February, how strange.

Weak on the FAs part .    For offending on a regular basis like this (p*ss taking to you and me)  the punishment should increase with each offence .   
Slap on another 3 points deduction .

The Third Twin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1447
    • View Profile
Re: Conspiracy Theory
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2016, 09:42:16 PM »
Nuneaton docked 6 points in February 2012 for playing an ineligible player twice.

Nuneaton docked 3 points in February 2015 for playing ineligible player.

Nuneaton docked 3 points in February 2016 for playing ineligible player.

Anyone see a pattern, should have been more than 3 points as its clearly not the first time and always in February, how strange.

Weak on the FAs part .    For offending on a regular basis like this (p*ss taking to you and me)  the punishment should increase with each offence .   
Slap on another 3 points deduction .

Too right it should be increased....after all, by their own rules, a second red in a season carries a longer ban than the first one, etc, etc...
He who would valiant be , 'gainst all disaster.
Let him in constancy follow the master.
There's no discouragement shall make him once relent
His first avowed intent, to be a Pilgrim.

John Bunyan, 1684