Author Topic: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?  (Read 5521 times)

Winging It

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
    • View Profile
No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« on: September 12, 2015, 02:24:44 PM »
Looking at the subs bench - SUBS: McGhee, Dowie, Sarpong, Walker & Deacey  its noted that we don't have a keeper on there.

In my eyes this is always risky,  what's others think ?

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2015, 06:26:27 PM »
Seeing all 5 subs were wingers/midfielders , any one of those omttted to make way for a goalie would seemed the best bet .

garry@

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 636
    • View Profile
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2015, 06:50:16 PM »
Let's hope this picking names out of a hat for goalkeepers Jersey stops soon, surely it's better to have a regular number 1, Alexander is by far the better of the youngsters we have, in my opinion.
Then maybe the defence will get to know what to expect from their Number 1 Mr Greene.

Artemis

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
    • View Profile
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2015, 07:08:34 PM »
Peterborough United recalled Friend this week and he has now been loaned out to Kings Lynn for rest of the season.  No doubt because he wasn't getting any matches at Boston.

Perhaps Ravas is now playing (& in Dennis's Radio Lincs interview said he was going to keep a settled side for a few matches to determine who the best goalkeeper is).  I wonder if that is just an excuse because he fears The Posh will recall Ravas.   
However isn't Alexander the better goalkeeper?

Last season we started badly, as far as I am concerned because we didn't have a settled goalkeeper;  12 months later and the same problem exists.

Burgh Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
  • Norwich United - best ground in Step 7 football!
    • View Profile
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2015, 11:00:50 PM »
Perhaps Ravas is now playing (& in Dennis's Radio Lincs interview said he was going to keep a settled side for a few matches to determine who the best goalkeeper is).  I wonder if that is just an excuse because he fears The Posh will recall Ravas.   
However isn't Alexander the better goalkeeper?


Absolutely right!!
Alan Partridge: "I bet I've got more friends than you've got cows. How many cows have you got?"
Farmer: "I've got 100 cows."
AP: "Well, I've got 104 friends!"

joshb

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
    • View Profile
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2015, 11:09:34 PM »
Alexander must've got a niggle again.... he's leagues apart from Ravas, who has thrown in 3 in 4 games, costing 3 points.
No excuse otherwise for him not to play.

Shauneyg

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
    • View Profile
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2015, 11:27:17 PM »
No injury to Alexander. purely Dennis choosing to play ravas, he sees rotating the keeper as no issue I disagree, ravas has cost us points everytime he has played.

Bannovallum Bill

  • Guest
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2015, 11:35:54 PM »
Only second time seen BUFC this season but others around me suggested that Henrich's selection over Jason was not 100% based on their individual abilities. May be right that Henrich selected due to pressure from his parent club?
« Last Edit: September 12, 2015, 11:39:50 PM by Bannovallum Bill »

Artemis

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
    • View Profile
Re: No keeper on the bench today, risky or not ?
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2015, 03:56:04 PM »
No injury to Alexander. purely Dennis choosing to play ravas, he sees rotating the keeper as no issue I disagree, ravas has cost us points everytime he has played.

I may have been mistaken but I am sure one reason Dennis gave for not playing Alexander  was because he was only 18 yo.   Ravas is only 17.
He also said the issue isn't about goalkeepers.   
Really? 
It was the main reason we started badly last season - not having a settled goalkeeper. 

Most people learn from their mistakes...........

« Last Edit: September 13, 2015, 04:19:38 PM by Artemis »