I've always rated Garner as a possible forward. See my remark after the Guiseley match last December. Perhaps B. Grimes should eat his words and accept that I was not on the mulled wine !!
No, no and no. Am prepared to eat my words if pro end wrong Eddie but scoring a goal does not a centre forward mak regardless of how mu he apparently enjoys it.. Bore scored a wonder goal but it didn't make him a better full back. SG with Pidge are our CH's leave them be. Or possibly play three at the back with steer and McGhee as wing backs but other than chasing a game when its different keep Scotty far away from th front line as is possible.
I suspect you did not see the match yesterday nor attend the forum BG . Greene claimed Garner had been scoring goals "for fun" in training and was keen to play up front .
Regardless of a good goal Garner put in an accomplished all round performance , with good lay-offs and good interplay with Southwell , give them a chance BG , Den is maybe working his magic with this partnership turning them into a dream team .
Again if you had been at the match you would have seen we still would have probably the best central pair of defenders in the league without Scott .
Why mess about with formations , stick Garner up front .
I am sure some of my fellow old farts will soon be on to tell you about the likes of John Charles , and in your era Malcolm Macdonald other examples .
