Author Topic: TIMMS  (Read 5744 times)

cambocakes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
TIMMS
« on: November 02, 2013, 03:53:44 PM »
Too much controversy around him,not respectful to managment and erratic performances costing us goals...there must be better out there.Sooner hes gone the better....LIABILITY!!! >:(

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2013, 03:55:00 PM »
Too much controversy around him,not respectful to managment and erratic performances costing us goals...there must be better out there.Sooner hes gone the better....LIABILITY!!! >:(

Agree

kingofnaves

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2013, 03:57:08 PM »
Agree! Hes taking the piss!

bostonian

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2013, 03:59:19 PM »
vince on

cambocakes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2013, 04:00:12 PM »
good luck to the fella..

flynny69

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2013, 04:02:43 PM »
Too much controversy around him,not respectful to managment and erratic performances costing us goals...there must be better out there.Sooner hes gone the better....LIABILITY!!! >:(

Some people have short memories!

The team haven't turned up yet, second in every challenge, not interested in making runs, and again lumping the ball long instead of playing it on the floor - which especially today hasn't worked, not only because our forwards are vertically challenged, but the wind.

Timms has miskicked one ball, which happens to everyone. The wind and a soft free kick have played a big part in the other goals.

Oh, and it's a game of two halves...

Artemis

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 711
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2013, 04:09:40 PM »
Too much controversy around him,not respectful to managment and erratic performances costing us goals...there must be better out there.Sooner hes gone the better....LIABILITY!!! >:(

Some people have short memories!

The team haven't turned up yet, second in every challenge, not interested in making runs, and again lumping the ball long instead of playing it on the floor - which especially today hasn't worked, not only because our forwards are vertically challenged, but the wind.

Timms has miskicked one ball, which happens to everyone. The wind and a soft free kick have played a big part in the other goals.

Oh, and it's a game of two halves...

Timms has a habit of lumping the ball long - from your posting you give the impression that Timms isn't at fault in that respect - ARE YOU AT THE GAME???

cambocakes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2013, 04:12:59 PM »
hes blundered twice tday,he blundered there before in the cup game...he had a hissy fit with a football in another game and has a total disregard for management team...hes up his own arse and becoming major negative talking point in the club....HES A LIABILITY!!!!.....as for the wind..hes a bloody keeper and should b able to judge  all weather conditions..FEEBLE DEFENCE

cambocakes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2013, 04:14:28 PM »
FEEBLE DEFENCE meaning your support for him rather than our fine defending formation..lol

kingofnaves

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2013, 04:18:57 PM »
Rumoured to be injured at training the other night.Does he really want to play for us?

kingofnaves

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2013, 04:20:26 PM »
Wonder if Timms has called for a taxi home?

Artemis

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 711
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2013, 04:30:50 PM »
According to my contact at the game - Timms was at fault for ALL the goals.

flynny69

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2013, 05:45:51 PM »
hes blundered twice tday,he blundered there before in the cup game...he had a hissy fit with a football in another game and has a total disregard for management team...hes up his own arse and becoming major negative talking point in the club....HES A LIABILITY!!!!.....as for the wind..hes a bloody keeper and should b able to judge  all weather conditions..FEEBLE DEFENCE

If meteorologists aren't able to judge all weather conditions, how do you expect Timms to do so?

The only real positive from the first half was Marrs' performance. Despite the undesirable weather conditions, he looked like he wanted to be there. Whereas Hall spent most of the game on the floor, after being caught in possession far too many times. The front three spent some time half-heartedly chasing the long punts from defence and midfield - that were hoofed into the swirling wind, rather than a simple shout of 'time' followed by playing a five yard pass.

Brackley, to be fair, were organised and up for it in the first half; they were the better side. The wind had a huge impact on the game, anyone who disagrees must not have been there.

The second half was a completely different kettle of fish! Though unless Timms was injured, the decision to take him off was bizarre! There weren't enough men behind the ball in the first half, when the wind meant it was difficult to get out of our own half. There were large gaps which were exploited and the strikers were chasing attempted clearances rather than getting the ball to feet - I'm not sure if they've been told to wait for the ball to come to them or not, but I lost count of the times that, Miller in particular, was beaten to the ball by an opponent.

The fact our first goal, which was an own goal, went in so early on, coupled with the weather conditions set up a decent half of football (Turley was in no way to blame for the goal).

The second was a great run round the back by Newsh, and was finished well. There were countless chances created throughout the second half, but there was a lack of killer instinct at times. Sanders had very little impact on the game; I think he fetched the ball once?!

Brackley were stronger and more committed than us, they played to their strengths and took their chances. Though I don't think Andy Hessenthaler will have too much to report back - apart from Turley's red card, the save he made just prior to his dismissal secured Brackley all three points!


The Big M

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2013, 07:31:40 PM »
As bad as boston was first half they were just as bad second half. And even a meteorologist can call the weather if they are stood in it

oxo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1813
    • View Profile
Re: TIMMS
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2013, 08:14:00 PM »
Following the cup game I criticised Timms and got some real stick on here with lots of you saying he is a class keeper. Well today he performed as if he was auditioning for a pantomime, His errors have caused us to be out of the cup and today cost us three points, incidentally his pathetic attempt to clear the ball for the third was with his strongest foot. Yes the weather was awful but in the first half we were hardly at the races with the exception of the new fullback who was head and shoulders above the rest. In the second half we bombarded them with a lovely goal from Newsham however we could not force a third.