Author Topic: Tinpot  (Read 7842 times)

lonegunman

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 861
    • View Profile
Re: Tinpot
« Reply #15 on: June 04, 2013, 06:45:10 AM »
Nothing wrong with a sense of reality.

Anyone who thinks this club will be anywhere near the top 5 is kidding themselves.

We've embraced mid table mediocrity, despite all the chairman's words I don't see any actions towards reversing the trend of the last few seasons.

Still, I'm sure the community side will win some award so all is OK......... ::)

Things look promising in regards to next season in my opinion. Drury knew what the problems with the squad were; lacked a couple of decent centre halfs, holding midfielder, a big man upfront and needed to be a little less vulnerable in our style of play. Unfortunately he bought in all of the 'type' of players we needed but all (Lister, Watt, Foster and Smith) were well below the level required for Conf North and have now returned to their level. Instead of coaching the players on how to see a game out we ended up playing the worst style of football I've ever seen st YS; throw-ins looked like a poor imitation of an Olympic sport!

In my opinion Greene got the call spot on with every player as regards to the retained list. Field was promising but not good enough to be a regular in a top side at this level and left first time because he didn't want to warm the bench. Silk was the biggest disappointment of the season after how good he was first time round. Haystead was a decent shot stopper but didn't organise his back four and the rest as I have said were sub-standard Drury signings. Many have questioned retaining Stainfield and Ward but at times they have both looked good, are young strong lads with the right attitude and probably very low earners as they were signed from reserve sides who pay nowt! I expect them to be our fifth and six choice defenders at the start of the season though as Greene said in an article he wanted four new players along with Marshall for the back five next season.

New signings look good with Timms being labeled 'the best in non league' although seeing is believing. The young defender from Corby was probably the most talked about away team player on the terraces last season which speaks volumes and we have signed the baller wining midfielder we needed who has a fantastic record at this level. The only Greene signing to wear the amber shirt so far was Mills and he looked at very good winger at the end of the season.

Players coming in seem to be of much higher quality than those released presumably requiring higher wages? Either Greene is a very good negotiator or he has more money to spend on wages due to not having two sidekicks unlike Lee and Drury? With only Bunce to help him who may be still unpaid as I believe all associated with the reserves are. No fitness coach or expensive number two means more Indians and less chiefs?

Good post and good shout.

check the grassy knoll and the IPA Green King  :bunny
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.
Oscar Wilde
When Confronted By A Difficult Problem, You Can Solve It More Easily By Reducing It To The Question, "How Would The Lone Ranger Have Handled This?

Keynsham Pilgrim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
    • View Profile
Re: Tinpot
« Reply #16 on: June 04, 2013, 01:34:45 PM »
I see Yeats unsurprisingly was one of the first to jump ship and further his 'career' at North Ferriby, a club I'm absolutely embarrassed to say are in the same league as us.......Trinity I can put up with as they know no better than this level, but it shows how far we've fallen when we might share a mid table finish with a club with not one genuine supporter, like Vauxhall and Solihull.....

Good luck to Gainsborough in their relegation battle next season, I've a feeling we'll not be ever so many places above them.

I can't say i agree with you on this one NF.  Over the past 20 years (from 1993/94) then we have been at this level (or below) for 13 of those seasons.  That is a long period of time but the problem is these teams that you have referred to such as NFU or VM have come up to this level rather than us falling.  What i have a problem with is accpeting mediocrity at this level but if you have small teams being bankrolled on bigger budgets then we can't compete and will invariably finish below them.

Also i do beleive that our Community Projects should be applauded but should not be prioritised for the sake of the first team.

Gus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
    • View Profile
Re: Tinpot
« Reply #17 on: June 04, 2013, 03:15:53 PM »
I'm not 100% sure but I believe the community projects are funded by grants etc. and therefore money would not be allowed to be diverted to the first team.

 

B Grimes

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
    • View Profile
Re: Tinpot
« Reply #18 on: June 04, 2013, 10:21:33 PM »
Surely it has no bearing on what the playing budget will be, these schemes are surely funded by the FA and as such will have the strictest of caveats, do's and don'ts attached to them

We have to play within our means, and only the manager will decide who is good enough or not regardless of how, where or why they arrive at the ground and if that to some, borders on he mediocrity then unfortunately so be it.

We simply can't afford to raid the prem for players and the nearest Conf North team to us where we could possibly poach/compete players are GT and.............Histon?

All the rest are miles away, so what is a manager supposed to do, in my eyes the only thing he can do is strike a balance, we cant ask for any more than that, and once that is accepted can do nothing more than hope that it will be good enough