Welcome to Pilgrims Patter
Quote from: Bostonshire on February 14, 2013, 09:04:55 PMQuote from: Steelihat on February 14, 2013, 08:54:49 PMWhy keep releasing contracted players?Payoffs usually equate to ( minimum) 50% of outstanding contract, and that's if players agree ( otherwise 100%)Add to that the (albeit lower) wage of new signings, and there is not much of a saving on the balance sheet.Good to get rid of disruptive/ crap/ useless players, but essentially if you give out 12 month contracts, then you are stuck with them.Better to let them try harder towards the end of the season, to try to earn contracts elsewhere, whilst the manager is targetting new players for next seasons challenge50% is rubbish mate do not know where you heard that. think you find most at this level cancel there contract for a couple of weeks wages.Oh we will all be suprised but he was not on contract so would not have needed a pay offWhy would they? No point in contract if it only takes two weeks notice. The 50% is standard terms and conditions.Agents, and PFA still control even at this level. The following report suggests he signed a 12month dealBoston UnitedIn July 2012 he joined Lincoln City on trial.[6] In August he signed a one year deal with Jason Lee's Boston United.[7] Following a managerial change at the club, new United boss Graham Drury released Silk on 12 February 2013 after his university commitments had prevented him from training on thursday nights. Drury added "I need all my players to train on thursday nights". Silk played 26 times for The Pilgirms and made his final appearance against local rivals Gainsborough Trinity.
Quote from: Steelihat on February 14, 2013, 08:54:49 PMWhy keep releasing contracted players?Payoffs usually equate to ( minimum) 50% of outstanding contract, and that's if players agree ( otherwise 100%)Add to that the (albeit lower) wage of new signings, and there is not much of a saving on the balance sheet.Good to get rid of disruptive/ crap/ useless players, but essentially if you give out 12 month contracts, then you are stuck with them.Better to let them try harder towards the end of the season, to try to earn contracts elsewhere, whilst the manager is targetting new players for next seasons challenge50% is rubbish mate do not know where you heard that. think you find most at this level cancel there contract for a couple of weeks wages.Oh we will all be suprised but he was not on contract so would not have needed a pay off
Why keep releasing contracted players?Payoffs usually equate to ( minimum) 50% of outstanding contract, and that's if players agree ( otherwise 100%)Add to that the (albeit lower) wage of new signings, and there is not much of a saving on the balance sheet.Good to get rid of disruptive/ crap/ useless players, but essentially if you give out 12 month contracts, then you are stuck with them.Better to let them try harder towards the end of the season, to try to earn contracts elsewhere, whilst the manager is targetting new players for next seasons challenge