Stamford forum

[green hats mate]

Re; Ricky Miller departs .......
The last few postings on the above thread may be of interest to Patter followers .

[Bostonshire]

The once that have suddenly vanished aswell

[Shauneyg]

Have just gone on there to read this myself. You have to laugh the way people make these assumptions up. I have no connection to sammyj or Graham Drury!! People just accept I'm a genuine pilgrims fan 

[green hats mate]

What do you recon to the sammyj postings being suddenly withdrawn Shauneyg ?

[Shauneyg]

Not alot to be honest. People are getting it totally wrong. It's laughable!!

[kingofnaves]

Have just gone on there to read this myself. You have to laugh the way people make these assumptions up. I have no connection to sammyj or Graham Drury!! People just accept I'm a genuine pilgrims fan 

Graham Drury is a genuine pilgrim fan aswell?

[miele]

 ( SHAUNEYG )

do you think KALLUM SMITH will be back ;; or over dinner did G.D.mention any other's he's  talking to

[Shauneyg]

I wish I knew the answers to them questions. 

[Myleftfoot]

There are lots of ways to dilute, misdirect and control forums. A regime can quickly and easily do this. Consensus cracking is a common ploy in engaging people to a view you wish them to have.  8)

[Myleftfoot]

Not entirely sure how intelligent either GD or the Shauney fellow are though! 

[father Ted]

 Or if you're making sense mlf  . .

[kingofnaves]

Not entirely sure how intelligent either GD or the Shauney fellow are though! 

Totally agree MLF! Has a brickie ever won Mastermind?

[Myleftfoot]

Take a look at the forum and consider! To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most likely develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped.  It's just a thought! 

Simples!  8)

[kingofnaves]

Take a look at the forum and consider! To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most likely develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped.  It's just a thought! 

Simples!  8)

Shauneyg or GD I guess you are confused with that statement?

[Myleftfoot]

Kon, are you suggesting they can't follow this simply process?