Not sure that Worcester were that much better than us - probably just looked better because they were more willing to have a shot? It was two poor teams and the quality deserved a 0-0 draw, but we made two basic errors (Haystead and Ward) and got lucky with our goal that was surely a foul on the keeper. Worcester also should have had a pen before we equalised - looked like a clear foul to me.
As the game went on, there only looked like being one winner and that was Boston as we had a couple of decent chances, but then Wardy's naivety cost us.
Agree with DL about the kid abusing the linesman - no reason to behave like that, but it may also have cost us some decisions. We had the same lineo last year (Nuneaton home game?) - he was abused all afternoon by one individual, tried to laugh it off by doing a bit of playing to the crowd, but then disallowed a last minute winning goal for us with a questionable offside. We got little out of him again on Saturday, although at least he didn't give that pen! Not sure if we got nothing because he's just not very good (always a bit wary of officials who play to the crowd too much), or because he had the hump with us?
We still need an experienced central defender who Ward & Stainfield can learn from. At the moment, they can only learn from their mistakes, and that means ... they will make mistakes. An experienced head alongside one of them could only help matters. An experienced defender was the one thing I thought we missed out on in the summer and we need to address this if we're going to improve.
Marshall and, to a lesser extent, Jones were the only ones who did themselves any justice on Saturday - we need more than 2 players to perform tonight. Two positives from Saturday were that Marshall had one of his best games for us and last season we would have lost that 3-0 so we more competitive this year even when playing badly.