Author Topic: 1 2 or 3 should go?  (Read 16433 times)

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2012, 06:11:19 PM »
I think Scott may be wiser now .  Some have still not learned the lessons of the Evans era , advocating spending more than our income permits .

noughtyforties

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Making a stand against apologists since 2004
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2012, 06:29:08 PM »
I don't dislike Scott and I take my hat off to his dedication to the cause.

But.......

KoN has been going as long as I have so he's hardly a 'non supporter' is he, as long as he pays his way he's is entitled to his opinion, he wants success as much as any of us, but its hardly rocket science to see the team isn't any better prepared than last seasons.

Ed Kandi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1493
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2012, 06:35:26 PM »
  Some have still not learned the lessons of the Evans era , advocating spending more than our income permits .

There will always be a few hoping for BUFC to spend its way to success.
The off-field progress has been good since the Chestnuts arrived, hope they stick around long enough to see the footballing side catch up  :dan

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2012, 06:48:24 PM »
Hardly rocket science that picking a manager is a complex process .
Worthless soundbites come easy "contacts , cheap option , ambitous , push the boat out "to name a few .
Can,t recall a name being but forward by advocates of chance to fit the bill .
Like suggested on patter previously a manager should be given a couple of years to establish themselve .
Anyone disagree?

Myleftfoot

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1257
  • There'll be no siestas in Madrid tonight. Keegan
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2012, 06:50:05 PM »
Hardly rocket science that picking a manager is a complex process .
Worthless soundbites come easy "contacts , cheap option , ambitous , push the boat out "to name a few .
Can,t recall a name being but forward by advocates of chance to fit the bill .
Like suggested on patter previously a manager should be given a couple of years to establish themselve .
Anyone disagree?




Nice post GHM.
“Football is war minus the shooting.” – George Orwell

father Ted

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1748
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2012, 07:23:12 PM »
 "Like suggested on patter previously a manager should be given a couple of years to establish themselve .
Anyone disagree?"

 Well,,I dunno .Only the chairman can sack a manager ,and maybe the style depends on the way that chairman operates   his business .
 Maybe someone can open a thread , now asking "If BUFC lose to CBFC tomorrow , should there be a change of management .?.
            No /Don't Know / Yes  .

kingofnaves

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2012, 08:10:42 PM »
Did Scott and Hurst overspend?Im sure Mr Newton wouldnt allow them to overspend!

Lord Cutler Knobhead

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2241
  • I'm disinclined to acquiesce to your request.
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #22 on: September 07, 2012, 08:32:33 PM »
And only the chairman has the ability to see everything aside from the results.  There is more to managing a football club than results, he can see the training, the bottom line, the work thats going in and the bigger picture.

Only the men at the top will know if they're getting value for their money.
So many people have come and gone, their faces fade as the years go by.
Yet I still recall as I wander on, as clear as the sun in the summer sky.

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #23 on: September 07, 2012, 09:01:58 PM »
Don,t think DN would let them overspend but the budget has been reduced twice since .
Rob & Paul had the one ingredient most the manager bashers on here did not see,  luck .
They had the backbone of a good squad to bring from Ilkeston thanks (dare i say it) to David holdsworth,  plus thanks to steve walsh for recommend a outstanding defender in Pearson .
Assembling a team of part-time players at a relative outpost like Boston involves far more than the fantasy football managers on here fail to think about

Myleftfoot

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1257
  • There'll be no siestas in Madrid tonight. Keegan
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #24 on: September 07, 2012, 09:10:51 PM »
Don,t think DN would let them overspend but the budget has been reduced twice since .
Rob & Paul had the one ingredient most the manager bashers on here did not see,  luck .
They had the backbone of a good squad to bring from Ilkeston thanks (dare i say it) to David holdsworth,  plus thanks to steve walsh for recommend a outstanding defender in Pearson .
Assembling a team of part-time players at a relative outpost like Boston involves far more than the fantasy football managers on here fail to think about



Absolutely right GHM. Some on here just look at the present and not the long story!  :(
“Football is war minus the shooting.” – George Orwell

kingofnaves

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #25 on: September 07, 2012, 09:23:46 PM »
And some can't see no further than their nose end!

Myleftfoot

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1257
  • There'll be no siestas in Madrid tonight. Keegan
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #26 on: September 07, 2012, 09:35:58 PM »
And some can't see no further than their nose end!




Hey big nose be quiet !!! mind the letter box ;)
“Football is war minus the shooting.” – George Orwell

Lord Cutler Knobhead

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2241
  • I'm disinclined to acquiesce to your request.
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #27 on: September 07, 2012, 11:41:05 PM »
"If BUFC lose to CBFC tomorrow , should there be a change of management .?.
            No /Don't Know / Yes  .

It's not that cut throat, it soon will be, but I think David isn't going to make a call on 90 minutes of football away from home in the arseend of nowhere.
So many people have come and gone, their faces fade as the years go by.
Yet I still recall as I wander on, as clear as the sun in the summer sky.

dt woodhall

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1090
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #28 on: September 08, 2012, 10:07:47 AM »
all should go.

i still think there are lots of players we have seen this year that are better than what we have got so far, and they will cost significantly less in wages than our existing players.

the existing managers do not seem capable of identifying and getting this sort of player to come and play for the team.

lets see what happens in 3 or 4 games time if the results stay this bad.

Fishtoft Crew

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
    • View Profile
Re: 1 2 or 3 should go?
« Reply #29 on: September 08, 2012, 11:39:20 AM »
Thats funny they would cost considerably less. I suggest DT you speak to a few and ask the question.