Author Topic: Should Lee and Cannovile be offered new deals?  (Read 27616 times)

Burton Pilgrim

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 507
    • View Profile
Re: Should Lee and Cannovile be offered new deals?
« Reply #75 on: April 17, 2012, 01:29:47 PM »
Cheer up people - this is a positive move.

Two things have been abundantly clear as the season has gone on - 1) the two managers thing hasn't really been working and 2) Canners can't cut it at this level as a player any more - it's a shame but after all the injuries his legs have gone and the last 2 home games have shown this very clearly.

Jason comes across as an intellient bloke with a decent football brain.  With an assistant who has a bit more experience in certain areas of management, I think he will develop into a decent manager. 

Many other teams in this league have assistant managers on the bench.  It's not something we've ever really done, other than the Evans era, and I think it will benefit the club with the right man in place.  Let's wait and see who it is before jumping to conclusions/criticising.

As for the comments about things being done on the cheap - firstly, if you want bigger budgets put your hand in your own pocket.  But also, 'cheap' doesn't necessarily mean bad.  S&H came from a smaller club with little experience.  Look at some of the other successful managers in this league - Steve Housham came from Brigg, Steve Kittrick from Osset; hardly big money signings.  In contrast, if you get a big budget big name you could end up with a Brian Little (or a Steve McLaren at Forest)

We all need to get behind Jason and his new assistant - get down to York Street at the start of next season, let's get some money coming in through the turnstiles and see what we can do.

Seenbetter

  • Guest
Re: Should Lee and Cannovile be offered new deals?
« Reply #76 on: April 17, 2012, 01:59:12 PM »
I think we would all agree on the following ambitions for the club. 1 To be financially viable and be able to stand on its own two feet. 2 To achieve a ground relocation that would supplement Number 1. 3 T achieve success on the pitch which will produce its own rewards.
The question is, in which order do you personally put them in. To financially support the ambition of promotion would mean sacrificing some of the support for the other 2 which would be disasterous and endanger the survival of the club AND although we have a terrific chairman I think he is too wise to pump money into the club to achieve promotion ahead of survival and relocation.
Support the chairman, yes. Support the club, yes, but come on, do you really think we can afford the quality of player and manager required for promotion when the long term future is the main ambition.
Promotion would be great and if JL can achieve that on a minimal budget that would be even better but to gamble on success ahead of survival and relocation would be folly.
The chairman has ambitions for the club but in which order would you put them in.   

Bartmac

  • Guest
Re: Should Lee and Cannovile be offered new deals?
« Reply #77 on: April 17, 2012, 03:25:43 PM »
1) Financial viability

2) New Ground, as the rent for this one is strangly us

3) Team, within a usable budget

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: Should Lee and Cannovile be offered new deals?
« Reply #78 on: April 17, 2012, 04:20:29 PM »

 4)   A bookie adjacent to the ground .   (surprised you overlooked that Barmac.)