A few more random observations ...
(1) Looking at the document again (see link below), it does say "PROPOSED" club allocations in the title.
http://www.thefa.com/Leagues/NationalLeagueSystem/NewsAndFeatures/2011/~/media/Files/PDF/Leagues/NLS/NLS_Restructuring_2011-12.ashx/NLS_Restructuring_2011-12.pdfDoes this mean that clubs could still appeal against where they have been placed? And will there be a "CONFIRMED" document to follow at a later date?
(2) I wonder why the FA released the document prior to the Luton vs AFC Wimbledon play-off final being resolved?
(3) Interesting to see two Enfield clubs - Enfield Town and Enfield 1893 - now competing in the same league. Think there was a mass fall out that resulted in a second club being formed. At one time Enfield were on a par with the likes of Barnet at the upper end of the Conference ... just makes you wonder if they could have still been there if they hadn't fallen out amongst themselves and kept things together.
(4) Maidstone United relegated back to the Isthmian League Division One South. They climbed into the Football League but virtually had to start again when they lost their ground and the finances disappeared. I thought they were on their way back up though?
(5) Crawley Down have been promoted into the Isthmian League Division One South. At least the locals will have a second team they can support - if the money runs dry mid-season at the more senior club in the area.
(6) Lowestoft being placed in the Isthmian League Premier Division is a bit strange, though I know they've been there for a couple of seasons. Why have a coastal club travelling in and around London every other week, whilst at the same time having teams like Hitchin and Bedford in the Southern League Premier? The same point could apply to Bury Town.
(7) Ossett Albion relegated from the Northern Premier Division One North, but replaced in that division by Ossett Town. How many away supporters will be turning up at the wrong ground next season?