Author Topic: Too true Mr Chairman  (Read 2858 times)

Tash

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
  • BUFC
    • View Profile
    • Addisons
Too true Mr Chairman
« on: September 03, 2010, 08:50:40 AM »
This surely has to be sorted out......

   
Tom Hopper joined Leicester City from Boston United.DAVID NEWTON has demanded non-league clubs receive more protection from the Football League vultures who raid their treasure trove of young talent.

Boston United lost Centre of Excellence star Tom Hopper to Leicester City for nothing earlier this summer.

If the Pilgrims had been a Football League club, they would have received compensation for the talented striker, who, then 15, became United's youngest-ever player last season when he figured in the UniBond League Premier Division.

But with the number of non-league clubs with Centres of Excellence on the rise, Newton insists the matter must addressed.

"The one thing I think we're lacking at our level is protection of players," explained the Pilgrims chairman.

"We couldn't keep Tom because once you're out of the Football League structure, you can't protect your players.

"While we're very pleased for Tom, it left us with nothing.

"Something needs to be done because we're running a Centre of Excellence, just like the full-time, professional clubs.

"There's no point us putting a lot of time and effort into developing a player and then they go for nothing."

Newton does not have to look far to see the potential cash Boston are missing out on under the current legislation.

Last season, Grimsby Town, then still a Football League club, are believed to have received a six-figure fee for striker Jack Barlow. The 15-year-old was handed a five-year contract with the Hull City, then a Premier League side.

"Grimsby sold a lad who we think is no better then Tom for £100,000," added Newton.

"We would probably rate Tom at that level, but we received nothing.

"If you look at the Conference Premier  now, there are big clubs like Darlington, Mansfield and Luton.

"A lot of those clubs are running Centre of Excellence programmes so the picture is changing.

"It's something that does need resolving. There's no justification for a club running a full Centre of Excellence programme when we can't protect our players.

"A couple of Conference clubs have put forward representations to the FA.

"I think the Conference may have moved its position (in favour of changing the rules). It's something we're pursing."

United's head of youth Steve Welsh played a part in Hopper's development at York Street.

He also believes the current system needs overhauling.

"Of course we were very pleased for Tom when he went to Leicester, it was a great opportunity for him," said Welsh.

"But it's galling when the club puts a lot of time, effort and money into a youth system, only to receive nothing when your best players leave.

"If Tom had gone from Lincoln City to Leicester, they would have received a fee, but we got nothing.

"We've got a lot of very good young players at the club and I can see us losing up to half a dozen more this season
IWJLTSTSPFKARIADASICR

father Ted

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1748
    • View Profile
Re: Too true Mr Chairman
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2010, 10:52:31 AM »
 Very frustrating . . . now we have the Reserves maybe C O E could be scaled down  ?
  As probably  no solution in near future .

Pilgrim86

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5163
    • View Profile
Re: Too true Mr Chairman
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2010, 03:12:13 PM »
The reserves are supposed to be self-funding, so shouldn't require reductions elsewhere
I create YouTube videos (BUFC/FM/CM 01-02), and stream Football Manager on Twitch as BostonUnitedFM.

http://bufm.co.uk/

qwerty

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
    • View Profile
Re: Too true Mr Chairman
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2010, 04:52:26 PM »
Our C of E is financed by the parents & sponsors and runs at a profit to help finance the running of the first team, just like the community club, college courses, pilgrim lounge, reserve team and all the other derivatives of BUFC.

Centres & Academys attached to football league clubs are part/all financed by the FA so the respective clubs can hold the players registration.

While the idea of our C of E  being run to help finance the first team fits in well with the larger 'business plan' I cannot see how parents of C of E players can be asked to finance the C of E AND THEN the club hold the players registration.

The real problem here is the FA (football some how) should be financing the C of E in the first place then the registration could be held by the club.