Author Topic: Target V Standard  (Read 4465 times)

kingofnaves

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
    • View Profile
Target V Standard
« on: April 21, 2010, 04:45:38 PM »
Which is the better for football coverage?With the Target free delivered paper stopping in June!What paper will you buy?

freiston fan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2010, 05:32:46 PM »
For sport Strandard.The target give so little coverage to the local Sat league its unbelievable yet over 500 local blokes play on a Saturday and fixtures are not even in paper.Yet play some rare sport you get better coverage.

ALICE

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2010, 06:08:04 PM »
Todays editions of both papers clearly have answered the question - STANDARD always.  No mentionof BUFC on front page of target - full front page coverage in the standard

noughtyforties

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Making a stand against apologists since 2004
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2010, 07:03:13 PM »
The Target's gone rapidly downhill since Rob Singleton and the old school journo's left a few years ago. Sports coverage used to be fantastic, now its just brief summaries and rehashed Echo articles.

The Standard is OK but the coverage is a bit ropey now Browny's joined us proles on the terraces........ ;)

Pete Brooksbank

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1735
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2010, 07:24:18 PM »
The Target's gone rapidly downhill since Rob Singleton and the old school journo's left a few years ago. Sports coverage used to be fantastic, now its just brief summaries and rehashed Echo articles.

The Standard is OK but the coverage is a bit ropey now Browny's joined us proles on the terraces........ ;)

Isn't the Target now just mostly re-printed Echo articles??

Read 'Flat Earth News', Andy. The Browneys of the world are a dying breed...

Shippy92

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
  • Just another Snapper...
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2010, 12:49:00 AM »
Todays editions of both papers clearly have answered the question - STANDARD always.  No mentionof BUFC on front page of target - full front page coverage in the standard

You liked the coverage today? I am remaining neutral on the subject, because both use my photos so both are equal in my eyes..... although the front page/back page photos was a bonus today!

Anita Goodsheet

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2010, 08:11:38 AM »
I like the target.... But then I like the standard.... But I wonder which ones better?....

Keynsham Pilgrim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2010, 08:31:39 AM »
Fight

Poros

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2010, 09:05:52 AM »
I used to be undecisive, but i'm not sure now.

Bartmac

  • Guest
Re: Target V Standard
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2010, 04:36:11 PM »
I've been on an Assertiveness course so I think it's the Standard :)