Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - green hats mate

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 313
31
The B-Ark / Re: King's Lynn
« on: March 07, 2020, 10:04:00 AM »
Come on guys we have to be careful when we start throwing the brown stuff about.   Glasshouses, Evans etc.   Certainly done for us, and lucky to be back where we are.
     
             True semion ,  If Lynn go bust they will be in a better place than we were ,  their ground belongs to the council.



32
The B-Ark / Re: King's Lynn
« on: March 07, 2020, 10:00:27 AM »
I think that's highly unlikely, and in any event I would HATE to win the league like that. I'd much prefer King's Lynn to spend within their means and not get into trouble in the first place! And are they even in trouble right now? I've not heard anything, and if their chairman's chucking the money in for now then they'll easily last the season out. It's next season he's going to have a nasty surprise and may reconsider bankrolling them. The National League has ruined Chorley's finances.
495 at chorley on Tuesday night
Never went near that in conference North. That said, before their triple promotion they were in level 8 Constantly struggling to get beyond 200 gates

Often happens josh ,  many assume promotion increases gates , winning games in a lower league draws bigger gates than getting promotion and losing games on a regular basis .

33
The B-Ark / Re: King's Lynn
« on: March 05, 2020, 02:20:32 PM »
I and many others were certain Marriot would leave Lynn in January ,   If the claim is right about his pay no wonder nobody took him on .

34
The B-Ark / Re: 3-5-2
« on: February 26, 2020, 11:12:40 AM »
The only difference between the teams (apart from the goals) was that they played the ball on the ground and we didn't, too many balls just hoofed up the pitch.

Apart from that well done lads.

Agree Ernie 100 ,    Revert to 433 as suggested by Lee Newell ,   drop Scott Garner to the bench and eliminate most the  hoof balls .

35
The B-Ark / Re: Betting
« on: February 23, 2020, 03:42:34 PM »
William Hill have suspended my account,  so I only have access to skybet.  But good luck, 33/1 great price for a team on a roll.

The form you and the Pilgrims are in Mick I can see you getting red carded at Skybet in May . :)

36
The B-Ark / Re: The Penny's dropped
« on: February 23, 2020, 03:31:17 PM »
His mistake caused York to win.

Worth...every...penny.. 😂

His error didn't do us any favours ,   without it we may have been2 points closer to York .

37
The B-Ark / Re: Betting
« on: February 07, 2020, 08:35:19 PM »
Boston 28/1 to win the league with skybet.  Will be shorter if we win tomorrow.
Tempted Mick ?

38
The B-Ark / Re: v Blyth Spartans
« on: February 02, 2020, 02:33:27 PM »
A win is a win, its 3 points and up to 3rd.
Went to watch Lynn yesterday only because my friend paid for me to go 
Kidderminster were as poor as they were against us, but Lynn have seriously been found out by a team that can keep possession.
Marriott was simply marked out of the game, and kiddi closed everything down in midfield.
Southwell was shocking and TBH he looks like a player that should be playing a league below, if he doesn't soon start to find sine kind of form, he will be massive expence hanging round the neck of Culverhouse, and he will be that for a couple of years to come.
I really think that Lynn have run out of steam, and after our next 3 games we will see if we are seriously in with a chance of the title.
An interesting point being made by a lot of Lynn fans yesterday is how long Marriott will remain at the club, apparently Culverhouse wants Lynn to be full time next season and half of the squad has said that they will only stay if they go full time.
The Chairman has said he cannot afford to do that by himself and will walk away before he does.
The big investment that was coming has stalled and looks dead in the water, and apparently they will have a budget deficit of £346000 by the end of the season.
The real fans are extremely worried and were shouting abuse at Culverhouse yesterday calling him a selfish T**t who is going to bring the club to its Knees.
But we will wait and see what happens, fans say things that are simply not true at times, l think they will be ok and probably win the league, then l am sure investors will flock in as they do.
I do expect Lynn to be full time next season and probably make it to the football league in 2 years time.

Win the league , "and then investors will flock in "   .   I think the information you collected from their fans could well be correct .   Culverhouse seems to use the bulling tactics and bullshit on the chairman like a previous manager of ours did .  look how we finished up !.      Don't think they will have investors flocking in to but money into the club .

39
The B-Ark / Re: Shiels
« on: January 24, 2020, 05:53:50 PM »
What about Tuton for the direct and powerful role? From the little I've seen of him he seems to fit that bill.
I feel sorry for Tuton, he scored a few pre season and now is totally out of the running, l would imagine that he would have picked Knowles out with a pass when they broke free, instead of what Thewlis did and try and keep it.
What is Tuton's goals total over last 4 seasons ?
I don't think he should be judged on that, many strikers move to other clubs and find their scoring touch again, l am just making the point that he has never been given a proper chance, that's all.

In his last 79 games involving 7 clubs his goal tally is two(2) goals .
But how many have those have been from the bench??
I don't understand the animosity towards the lad, when we never get a chance to see what he can do.
Obviously Craig rates him or he would be down the road.
[/quote

No animosity from me .   Just can't understand how a player who only scores 2 goals in 79 games can be termed a striker .

40
The B-Ark / Re: Shiels
« on: January 23, 2020, 06:27:20 PM »
What about Tuton for the direct and powerful role? From the little I've seen of him he seems to fit that bill.
I feel sorry for Tuton, he scored a few pre season and now is totally out of the running, l would imagine that he would have picked Knowles out with a pass when they broke free, instead of what Thewlis did and try and keep it.
What is Tuton's goals total over last 4 seasons ?
I don't think he should be judged on that, many strikers move to other clubs and find their scoring touch again, l am just making the point that he has never been given a proper chance, that's all.

In his last 79 games involving 7 clubs his goal tally is two(2) goals .

41
The B-Ark / Re: Shiels
« on: January 22, 2020, 02:30:57 PM »
What about Tuton for the direct and powerful role? From the little I've seen of him he seems to fit that bill.
I feel sorry for Tuton, he scored a few pre season and now is totally out of the running, l would imagine that he would have picked Knowles out with a pass when they broke free, instead of what Thewlis did and try and keep it.
What is Tuton's goals total over last 4 seasons ?

42
The B-Ark / Re: Shiels
« on: January 22, 2020, 10:35:06 AM »
What about Tuton for the direct and powerful role? From the little I've seen of him he seems to fit that bill.
We what a goal scorer .

43
The B-Ark / Re: Do Kings Lynn have a back up plan.
« on: January 20, 2020, 04:39:57 PM »
The Lynn  Manager Culverhouse was an Ex player and assistant Manager at Norwich, so little wonder they can pull young talent in from there on loan.  All about connections in this game.

The Fat Fraudster has plenty of connections so that’s why the team changed every week.

Same with Green and loans from Sunderland .

44
The B-Ark / Re: BPA away
« on: January 06, 2020, 06:06:12 PM »
Looks like Jake Wright has been recalled.
If you want to know anything just ask me. Then ignore it. Jake here till the end of the season.

Nothings changed mate , recall you always beat the Boston Standard with the BUFC  "breaking news " 40 years ago .   Now your beating all comers in social media  ;)

45
The B-Ark / Re: v Kings lynn
« on: January 02, 2020, 12:47:25 PM »
It makes me laugh when all of a sudden we put in a poor performance and suddenly the manager and players are not good enough. We have been in good form but when 8 or 9 players have an off day then you usually get punished and that’s what we got. Anyone who thinks we are suddenly a poor side with a poor manager need to get back to their sky q box. We are a decent side who had an off day simple as that.

Win our the next two matches Tash and at 10 o'clock Tuesday night it's possible that we will be 5th in league above some teams below  us  having played a game more than us .        Happy new year to all at RUSKINGTON and hope we are all laughing along with you Tuesday night Dave .

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 313