Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dubai camel

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 24
31
The B-Ark / Re: New Stadium: Wyberton Village Hall meeting last night
« on: December 20, 2013, 02:08:26 PM »
SP makes a series of good points, rather you like him as a person or not.

The reality of BUFC is that we do not have a benefactor willing to stump up the cash for a new stadium and support the team.

Thus we have had a series of 'property' developers dabbling in the club's affairs to see if they can make some money out of a BUFC stadium. When in the League we attracted all sorts, mainly due to the availability of grants and other sources of finance, less so now.

The current Chairman's interest is being questioned by SP as being one of benefit for BUFC or himself or is it a win/win - that's how I see it.

Options include:

1. A die hard fan who genuinely did not want to see the club go to wall - stepped in with his own money to salvage the club and is now looking at ways to help the club, without costing himself too much cash.

2. The canny businessman, who rode into town at the last minute to maximum fanfare, always knowing that there was some money to be made out of the stadium build, especially when it could be packaged up as a sports/retail/housing project on land he already owned (bought on a punt that one day planning permission might be given, if the right project presented itself). A football club move polarises opinion for sure, but I doubt the BBC want to be seen as the body who refused planning permission and therefore kill the club. Hence the attraction of getting a football club as part of the development

3. Or a bit of both…..

Now compared to the criminals that went before, the present owners of the club can be viewed as a godsend on several fronts: they knew where York Street before they took over; they care about football; they can write a business plan; and they don't have offensive family members!




32
The B-Ark / Re: Congrats Chalker and Wife
« on: November 07, 2013, 05:02:10 PM »
Many congratulations

33
The B-Ark / Re: Chestnuts making a moderate loss on £10 Million turnover
« on: September 11, 2013, 11:27:13 AM »
Well said .... father Ted and truthsayer

34
The B-Ark / Re: Chestnuts making a moderate loss on £10 Million turnover
« on: September 10, 2013, 05:23:59 AM »
Scouse Pilgrim is entitled to post on here as much as anyone else. As long as it's not libellous or offensive or obscene or against the law. They're usually a load of b*******, but that's no reason to delete them.

Agreed Ken. Comments here smacks of censorship. Lots of articles from the Standard are posted here.

Not everything is football related on here, and yes Scouse Pilgrim is trying to muddy the waters somewhat by posting the story.

Stories about previous Chairmen still surface on here from time to time and that's fine too.

Do we have a new criteria? If 'we' like him we don't post the negative stories, but if he is seen as being the 'baddy' that's ok?


35
The B-Ark / Re: Chestnuts making a moderate loss on £10 Million turnover
« on: September 09, 2013, 05:39:29 PM »
Oh dear,  Must be silly season again. His restraining order must have expired

Seems a fair post to me ......

36
The B-Ark / Re: Chris cooks programme notes
« on: September 08, 2013, 04:11:00 PM »
They did mention having local primary school football teams play during the half time break,not sure if they got enough feedback on the idea though....

Middlesbrough use to do that at Ayresome Park (so that gives you an idea of how long ago it was). My team reached the finals twice (and lost twice).
Great for the kids, families often came along to watch as well. Lots of abuse from the crowd (25,000+) if you were from a posh school, thankfully I didn't
teach at a posh school.


37
The B-Ark / Re: Chris cooks programme notes
« on: September 05, 2013, 06:07:03 PM »

Do the club have a schools programme? Has the club looked at the often mentioned immigrant population as a new source of support?

Do the club have a schools programme?
probably one of the best from League two down
http://www.bostonunited.co.uk/a/united-in-the-community-28948.html
They will be in Central Park this SUNDAY

Has the club looked at the often mentioned immigrant population as a new source of support?

Our Polish cousins are not too fussed by football. Their favourite sports are Volley ball and Speedway (apart from carp fishing of course :) )


Am aware of the club's community programme but have never seen a group of children from a local school at a match for example .... catch 'em young etc.
How about hosting them for the afternoon?

Poland as a country is football mad ..... qualifying for most major tournaments (though rarely doing very well) and many of the German team are ethic Poles!

38
The B-Ark / Re: Chris cooks programme notes
« on: September 05, 2013, 06:06:26 AM »
A rallying call from Chris Cook is all well and good. Fans who read his thoughts are the ones forking out for the club e.g. programme and match ticket. It can be a fine line between a rallying call and having a go at the ones who already financially support the club.

Posters have been mentioned for years, so good to see the club finally getting around to getting them printed and now there is the job of getting them out there.
I believe the club sponsors do some promotion work with BUFC, perhaps this could be extended.

Do the club have a schools programme? Has the club looked at the often mentioned immigrant population as a new source of support?

The club does have full time staff - unlike many clubs at this level - to implement some of these ideas. Some of whom are busy than others........
These staff can be supplemented with volunteers for sure - but specifics need to be in place. Not just 'come and help the club'.
Hopefully a fund raising committee may do just that.

39
The B-Ark / Re: Conference North 2013/14
« on: May 21, 2013, 11:07:02 AM »
Awful League to be in. Please, please, please, let's get out of it. We need proper Conference football.

the traveling in the conference prem is not much different

http://www.nonleague.co.uk/maps/conference_premier.php


Conference Premier isn't much better -  but we are in a regionalised league, so in theory at least we should be better off.
For part time players it's a hard slog.

40
The B-Ark / Re: If Nigel Farage (UKIP)
« on: May 04, 2013, 05:49:21 PM »
Not often I agree with Ken Clarke but UKIP are in large part a bunch of clowns. But when faced with the reality of today's political parties, red noses can seem rather appealing.

UKIP keep things simple: no immigration and out of Europe - both great sound bites for the Daily Mail, but things are a little more complicated than that.

But are UKIP the real deal, I doubt it, be very careful what you wish for .........

Of course much that people now decry was started by UKIP's standard bearer and heroine - Mrs Thatcher - irony is a wonderful thing.
Who started selling all the country's silverware to foreigners? Yep Thatcher ..... she privatised anything she could sell, opened up the banking system and before you could blink, one British owned company went after another - free market economics she called it. Foreigners buying up Britain it was and is.

Immigration facts show Thatcher in a different light than many would have us believe:
Under labour in the 1970s, Britain had net emigration, whilst Edward Heath opened up immigration from many European countries in 1973. Thatcher herself opened the borders to Greek, Spanish and Portuguese workers in 1981 and 1986 and her successor John Major continued this trend and the ultimate Tory aka Tony Blair carried on opening further doors.

We could continue with Human Rights and the EU influence on 'our rights'. More right wing mythology.....

But you get the point.

41
The B-Ark / Re: How can we really...
« on: April 13, 2013, 06:59:57 AM »
Maxross has it right with regards to getting in the kids.

It is an area that needs to be looked at -  lots of good examples of promotion.

What advertising does the club do for matches, we all remember the posters in every chippie in town!

What school /  community links are there? Do club officials and players go into schools etc? Not easy with part time players but possible. Doesn't have to be just about playing can look at all aspects - team building, leadership, motivation etc. Most schools would welcome outside speakers to look at these areas.

Are the local immigrant population at all interested in attending? Has any market research been done on this?

A local club here in Dubai gave away a Ferrari to one lucky ticket holder - the crowd did double for that particular game but not sure it made much financial sense!

The answer is of course to have a team in contention for play-offs/promotion. Unfortunately from the word go we were some way short of this and very quickly the attendance trailed off.


42
The B-Ark / Re: O/T Maggie Thatcher
« on: April 13, 2013, 06:46:25 AM »
Question:

What have the Tory council and county council ever done for Boston?

43
The B-Ark / Re: O/T Maggie Thatcher
« on: April 12, 2013, 10:36:09 AM »
Taken form the Independent newspaper:

Baroness Thatcher was a leader of exceptional determination and willpower, driven by an absolute conviction that she knew what was best for Britain. But if David Cameron's tribute to her is correct, that was not all she could be admired for. "Margaret Thatcher didn't just lead our country – she saved our country," the Prime Minister claimed. The second half of that statement is worth examining. If Lady Thatcher saved Britain, what did she save us from, and where are we now?

Inflation and strikes

It is not really disputed that the UK was in bad shape in 1979. Trade unions are often blamed, because of the prevalence of strikes during the 1970s, but what people forget is that there was a reason for their militancy.

Inflation, which affected everybody, ate into the value of people's pay. It took huge pay rises just to keep up with prices. Inflation was rapidly coming down before Lady Thatcher came to power but was still in double figures, at 10.3 per cent per year, in 1979. At first, the Thatcher government unintentionally pushed it right back up over 20 per cent, but then ruthlessly brought it down to 5 per cent in time to secure victory in the 1983 election.

Today, it is 3.2 per cent. So it can reasonably said that Lady Thatcher saved the UK from runaway inflation.

Trade unions

Thatcher's government introduced a series of laws to curb union militancy, but when inflation was out of the system, employees had less reason to strike for higher wages, regardless of the state of industrial legislation. Instead, they faced the worse threat of being out of work. The major strikes of the 1980s, such as the year-long miners' strike, were over jobs, not pay. Every redundnancy of a union member weakened the union.

There were 1.4 million jobless in 1979, or 5.3 per cent of the workforce. That figure peaked at more than 3 million in 1986. Currently it is 2.52 million, or 7.8 per cent – so Lady Thatcher certainly did not save the UK from unemployment, though she did permanently weaken the unions. There were 12 million members of TUC affiliated unions in 1979. Now there are six million.

State ownership

"We were the first country in the world to roll back the frontiers of socialism," Lady Thatcher claimed after she left office. If 'socialism' means state ownership of industry, the claim is undeniably true. In 1979, the electricity, gas, water, coal and steel industries, and British Telecom and BP, were all state owned. Now all are in private hands.

Those privatisations were popular and in practice irreversible, because they replaced state monopolies with private firms competing in the market, improving efficiency. The exception, the botched privatisation of British Rail, was not her doing.

Home ownership

In 1979, 55 per cent of the population lived in owner-occupied homes, and 42 per cent in council houses or other 'socially rented' accommodation. Today owner occupation is around 70 per cent, while 18 per cent are in council or housing association homes. So she helped to bring millions of working class families the benefits of home ownership – but at a cost of rising homelessness, because the council homes that were sold have not been replaced. In 1979, there were just over a million households on housing waiting lists, now there are 1.8 million – though most of that rise came after Lady Thatcher's time.

Public debt and spending

Lady Thatcher's government did a good job of driving down government debt, which was 43.6 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 1979, and 26.7 per cent in 1990. In 2009, after the banking crisis, it was back where Lady Thatcher found it as a proportion of national output, and rising. In gross figures, the debt was £88.6bn in 1978-79, and £1,103.6bn in 2011-12. But she had those one-off asset sales and tax receipts from North Sea oil to help pay off debt, which no other government has had.

Public spending actually went up in the early Thatcher years, from 45 per cent of GDP to 48.5 per cent, before she started to bring it down. It was back at the 1979 level in 1987, and carried on falling until 1999, after which Labour let it rise slowly until 2008, when the cost of bailing out the banks made it shoot up from 41 to 48 per cent. It should be back to its 1979 level next year.

The pound

Lady Thatcher believed in keeping the value of sterling high. The pound was worth $2.06 in 1979. It shot up to $2.42 by October 1980, then fell to $1.81 within a year. It was $1.96 when she left office and is now worth $1.51, so she did not 'save' sterling from depreciating internationally.

Freedom to borrow

In 1979 there were strict rules about mortgage lending, about how shares were bought and sold, and how much money could be taken abroad. Her government scrapped them all, allowing building societies to become banks and banks to lend for mortgages, though any other government might have had to do the same because computer technology was globalising the money markets. The changes made it much easier for a young couple to raise a mortgage, but much harder to stop banks behaving recklessly. Her policies also pushed up house prices. A house that cost £83,000 in 1979 would cost £163,000 now.

Sexual freedom

Lady Thatcher personally had a reputation for being authoritarian, yet during her time sexual freedom generally increased, along with divorce rate and the rate of abortions. This is not something she encouraged, but she generally did not try to interfere. And this is possibly not what David Cameron meant when he said she 'saved' Britain. On a more negative note, she presided over a frightening rise in the crime rate, from just over 2.5 million recorded crimes in 1979 to 4.5 million in 1990. Lately, the figures have been falling, so that by 2010 it was below the 1990 figure. Lady Thatcher did not 'save' Britain from crime.

Britain's place in the world

A large part of the pre-1979 British malaise was assumed to be the loss of the empire and the sensation that having been the world's third most powerful state in 1945, the UK was sinking down the league table. There had been colonial wars lost, and the debacle of the Suez conflict. Lady Thatcher raised the nation's morale through the victory in the Falklands. She is also often credited with ending military rule in Argentina, though actually all South America's military dictators gave way to civilian rule in the 1980s.

But that aside, not much has changed. In 1979, Lady Thatcher agreed to buy Trident from the US. Now, the government is preparing to update it. Then, western opinion was outraged when the USSR sent the Red Army into Afghanistan. Now the west is embroiled in a war in Afghanistan which has dragged on for over 10 years.

Then, Lady Thatcher was in a minority of one at an EU summit, when she battled for a reduction in the UK's contribution to the EU budget. Two months ago, David Cameron was rather less isolated as he battled to keep the overall EU budget down, something he could not have achieved alone

Overall, Lady Thatcher did not save the UK from losing its position as a premier league world power, but she made patriotic Britons feel less miserable about their lost status. Myth of Thatcher is in full swing.....


44
The B-Ark / Re: Creepy Crawley
« on: March 27, 2013, 09:55:01 AM »
Someone knew what was coming ....

45
The B-Ark / Re: Defibrillators
« on: March 23, 2013, 04:39:28 PM »
John Boy that is not correct, as you have to give CPR between the shocks.

The CPR aspect is much more rigorous than for the usual first aid courses I have ever done.

Be aware of any water around the patient including sweat etc, as it conducts the current.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 24