Pilgrims' Patter

The Forum => The B-Ark => Topic started by: bostontarget.co.uk on April 09, 2014, 04:57:25 PM

Title: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: bostontarget.co.uk on April 09, 2014, 04:57:25 PM: Vice-chairman Neil Kempster believes Boston United have made “giant strides” under Dennis Greene this season, whether the Pilgrims clinch promotion or not.

Read more: http://www.bostontarget.co.uk/Dennis-Greene-hailed-reviving-Boston-United-s/story-20935238-detail/story.html#ixzz2yPBCkZCV
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 10, 2014, 02:14:19 PM: This sort of comment to the press is indicative of a Chairman who knows he should have sacked DG when his criminal activity came to light.

Now he feels compelled to make the case for keeping him on. :bunny

What is a pity is that the local hacks seem to be so much in bed with the club that there is little, if any censure, from them with regard to having a convicted fraudster managing the club (again!).
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: soccermad67 on April 10, 2014, 02:35:56 PM: you should get a life mate.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 10, 2014, 03:10:45 PM: Is that really the best you can do Soccermad67?

If you had any more sense you'd be a half-wit :dan

If you do want to persuade others that Mr Newton's decision was justified then you will need to proffer some decent argument such as "I would have Steve Evans back or Lord Lucan if it meant we had a chance to challenge for promotion to the Skrill Premier" or perhaps "let's just let bygones be bygones and to err is be be human etc"

Your latest comment just makes you look like a numbscull (and I mean that in a nice way) :bunny
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: doc on April 10, 2014, 04:01:08 PM: Ken
any chance of a separate section of forum dedicated to Scouse and those that want to argue with him? Wouldnt normally react but it seems every thread gets tainted and ends up in some slagging match. Which is getting fairly tedious
?
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 10, 2014, 04:11:08 PM: Dear Ken,

How about a sin bin for anyone who calls for a ban on any Patter member or who calls for separate forum for anyone who posts on Patter??

This would hopefully reduce the number of tedious posts such as the one preceeding this :bunny

Thank you for your consideration

SP
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: doc on April 10, 2014, 04:38:26 PM: you just proved my point.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Ken Fox on April 10, 2014, 05:19:39 PM: How about if I ban Scouse Pilgrim?

There have been about 160 users who have logged in to Patter in the last week, so if more than half are fed up with his inane postings then I'll ban him. Just post "Ban Him" below and if it reaches 81 then he'll be banned. Only one vote per user please.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Shauneyg on April 10, 2014, 05:29:34 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Seenbetter on April 10, 2014, 05:32:14 PM: Ban him.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: spannerman on April 10, 2014, 05:37:37 PM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: black n yella on April 10, 2014, 05:40:39 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: green hats mate on April 10, 2014, 05:49:50 PM: Ban him.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: C.B. on April 10, 2014, 05:54:50 PM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: wez33 on April 10, 2014, 06:00:36 PM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Pilgrim86 on April 10, 2014, 06:07:26 PM: Ban him.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: miele on April 10, 2014, 06:07:51 PM: HE aint a creep like a few on hear he says things as he sees it some interesting points and some I take no notice of.
if you say ban him it would bring you down to his level of IQ. (just don't bite). :) ;)
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: B Grimes on April 10, 2014, 06:36:33 PM: Ban him, twice!
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Lee Newell on April 10, 2014, 06:40:59 PM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: airsbufc on April 10, 2014, 06:53:27 PM: Ban him!
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Lady GaGa on April 10, 2014, 07:00:59 PM: Ban him please.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: kingofnaves on April 10, 2014, 07:08:16 PM: Keep him x 100
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Bostonshire on April 10, 2014, 07:15:48 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Ernie100 on April 10, 2014, 07:26:35 PM: Hang him ;D
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Tash on April 10, 2014, 07:52:18 PM: Ban him or her.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: miele on April 10, 2014, 07:59:47 PM: have a word with DG he may send him to K/LYNN that's were most of our don't wants go ( I would say keep him)
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Carl Newell on April 10, 2014, 07:59:59 PM: Ban Him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: bostonian on April 10, 2014, 08:30:13 PM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: nikko on April 10, 2014, 08:35:34 PM: ban it...
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: shorty2kuk on April 10, 2014, 08:45:23 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: bostonwoody on April 10, 2014, 09:13:08 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Cavalier on April 10, 2014, 09:16:25 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on April 10, 2014, 09:26:42 PM: Restrict him to one post a day, I've no problem with people having a problem with the club. It just floods every thread at the moment though.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Myleftfoot on April 10, 2014, 09:28:09 PM: I'm a fan ;)
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Tipps End Pilgrim on April 10, 2014, 09:41:50 PM: dennis greene ‏@densmagic Protected Tweets · 32s
Ban him #bufc

Expand
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: York Street Pilgrim on April 10, 2014, 10:00:59 PM: Ban him

Is there anyway though of preventing him from rejoining under a different alias? Beforehand he used to post his poison as Rooster Isaac, Pere Noel and God knows what else. If banned, what's the likelihood he'll just re-invent himself again?
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Carl Newell on April 10, 2014, 11:18:24 PM: As the gaffer I think Dennis vote should be counted!
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Constant Lurker on April 10, 2014, 11:44:23 PM: First Post: Ban Him

As the name suggests I've been a constant lurker on here for years. I've just enjoyed looking at the gossip and rumours and not really being too bothered one way or another. I've been a supporter of the club for quite a number of years and have turned up at most home matches when I lived in the area and occasional away matches where possible. I'm not a self-confessed "No 1" fan like some feel the need to profess, but do consider myself loyal to the town and club. I only felt compelled to finally make a post because my lurking was losing it's appeal because of the constant BS that seems to be spouted by one individual. If you're not a fan or supporter of the club then what's the point of stirring? I'm not an angry man.....just sayin'.

Probably the first & last post.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: ceamboy on April 11, 2014, 12:06:59 AM: Come on ken a forum is all about posters views on different subjects, if you don't like a particular subject you ignore it, as long as the posts are not malicious ,racist, slanderous, or downright abusive ,how can other posters decide to ban a poster from posting his or her views just because they don't agree with the posters views on that particular subject, surely if scouse pilgrim was doing any of the above wrong things he would be liable to prosecution by the law.
I have never read anything that as been posted by scouse pilgrim what could be described as malicious , racist, slanderous, or downright abusive, lots of what scouse pilgrim posts is witty and highly mischievous as I see it, he dangles the carrot and the donkeys take a bite , if he was ignored he would lose interest and maybe post his opinions on twitter or Facebook ,I enjoy all posters posts, I maybe don't agree with a lot of them, but I would not in any way try to ban them because I didn't agree with there posts.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Bostonshire on April 11, 2014, 12:12:39 AM: Quote from: ceamboy on April 11, 2014, 12:06:59 AM
Come on ken a forum is all about posters views on different subjects, if you don't like a particular subject you ignore it, as long as the posts are not malicious ,racist, slanderous, or downright abusive ,how can other posters decide to ban a poster from posting his or her views just because they don't agree with the posters views on that particular subject, surely if scouse pilgrim was doing any of the above wrong things he would be liable to prosecution by the law.
I have never read anything that as been posted by scouse pilgrim what could be described as malicious , racist, slanderous, or downright abusive, lots of what scouse pilgrim posts is witty and highly mischievous as I see it, he dangles the carrot and the donkeys take a bite , if he was ignored he would lose interest and maybe post his opinions on twitter or Facebook ,I enjoy all posters posts, I maybe don't agree with a lot of them, but I would not in any way try to ban them because I didn't agree with there posts.

Veiws are fine and good, this is more about the constant flood and hijacking of every second thread nearly making it impossible to bypass him.
TBH if there was away he could be restricted id go for that option myself but as i dont think there is i have to vote for ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Artemis on April 11, 2014, 12:26:19 AM: Ban Him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: beefpilgrim on April 11, 2014, 04:33:07 AM: He is not a fan or supporter of this club, every thread started by him is derogatory towards the club in one way or another be it DN, Cookie NK Or DG. He wants everything at the club to fail including the proposed new ground.
If ever he is asked about FOOTBALL, he avoids the subject like the plague... if he showed a smidge of interest in what goes on, on the pitch it may not be so bad to take!
His main objective is to just piss everyone off and I for one am sick of it there is never a balance to his posts and everyone else is wrong, as I have said before if he has a constant problem with the club then write to DN direct, the guy couldn't care less if the club was wound up and left to rot!.......BAN HIM!
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Devon Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 08:24:49 AM: Ban Him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 09:42:35 AM: Quote from: Tash on April 10, 2014, 07:52:18 PM
Ban him or her.

Cheeky boy, Tash! :dan

Please ban me (I need a new character to develop and Scouse is past her sell by date)
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Imp Stalker on April 11, 2014, 09:43:01 AM: I wouldnt ban him.

His drivel is amusing.

Everyone's welcome to an opinion.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: dt woodhall on April 11, 2014, 10:03:40 AM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: uncleremus on April 11, 2014, 10:24:40 AM: Ban him.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Bunyan on April 11, 2014, 10:57:03 AM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: BostonTilIDie on April 11, 2014, 10:58:53 AM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Keynsham Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 01:19:12 PM: Whilst some of the points raised by SP may not be agreeable to most and often repeated ad nauseum with little relevance to the subject matter at hand, i do not sit comfortably with banning of someone for expressing a view in a country that allows free speech.

I think that there is a need for reasonable behaviour within postings ie no swearing, abuse of any kind etc but banning someone for this is not the answer. We can scroll past any comments if we choose not to read them as there is no limit on the amount of postings in a subject or subjects.

I would not agree with a ban.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Stannington Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 01:39:57 PM: Ban
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Swineshead Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 02:16:40 PM: Is there a possibility of creating a thread that only Scouse can post to, airing his daily grievances without disrupting other unrelated threads? Better than an outright ban.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Tony A on April 11, 2014, 02:33:15 PM: Do his employers know he spends most of his days wasting his time on Patter ?

BAN HIM.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Dipdodah on April 11, 2014, 02:47:08 PM: Suspend him----------------------------------------------------for life.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 02:59:34 PM: What's the score Ken? Should I pen my letter of resignation now or sit it out? :bunny

I have noted all the names and they have gone in my little black book! Including yours Pike!

It is heartwarming to see that free speech, fine grammar and punctuation are so highly regarded by some Patterers! :dan
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 03:05:56 PM: Only 48 more banning orders needed Patterers.......

Come on mobilise! :-*
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Fairfax on April 11, 2014, 03:28:12 PM: Oh, leave him alone. What else will we do for entertainment? Everyone has the right to make a prat of himself; even me!
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 03:49:39 PM: Quote from: Constant Lurker on April 10, 2014, 11:44:23 PM

Probably the first & last post.

Let's hope so as you're clearly DG's shoe shine boy :-*
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: chris47 on April 11, 2014, 03:55:06 PM: Ban Him.................PLEASE.................Ban Him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 04:03:22 PM: Quote from: Ken Fox on April 10, 2014, 05:19:39 PM
with his inane postings

"Inane" for those of you who can't use Google means lacking in sense and substance.

So rather like Ken's poll on whether SP should be banned (or not).

Funny, I remember very well how upset Ken was when Sotnick tried to ban Patter and Ken sadly capitulated.

Sotnick was full of empty promises and Ken should have called his bluff :bunny
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 04:06:21 PM: Quote from: chris47 on April 11, 2014, 03:55:06 PM
Ban Him.................PLEASE.................Ban Him

Impressive ticker tape! How do you do that? :bunny
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Deeping Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 04:25:11 PM: Ban him.

However, I do think that BUFC are missing the trick here as "An Audience With Scouse Pilgrim" at the Pilgrim Lounge would be comedy gold. :)
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: stevie on April 11, 2014, 04:41:28 PM: I am sorry Scouse Pilgrim but I find that I am reading less and less on here because of your anti BUFC comments so although I believe in free speech I will have to side with the true supporters of our team and say "Ban Him"
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 04:43:24 PM: Quote from: beefpilgrim on April 11, 2014, 04:33:07 AM
every thread started by him is derogatory towards the club in one way or another be it DN, Cookie NK Or DG.

you confuse "derogatory" with "irreverent" my dear boy! :-*
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 04:47:52 PM: Quote from: stevie on April 11, 2014, 04:41:28 PM
anti BUFC comments

If I might correct you Stevie?

Not anti BUFC but perhaps not very pro- the current geezers running the show. :bunny

If you are not happy with what someone has to say, put your own viewpoint and try some reasoned discussion/argument.

Calls to ban SP just make you all look like you just can't handle him. Which is not the case I am sure. :-*
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Gus on April 11, 2014, 05:10:35 PM: I hate to say this but from someone who follows the club but may never set foot in the ground again, I have to say that I find some of SP's rants quite amusing.
However, some are simply inane and would be better left in the toilet where he surely does his research.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: dt woodhall on April 11, 2014, 05:20:40 PM: I have to say that he should be banned, but just ignore all his posts, do not comment on any, and hopefully he will go and irratate himself. As Ron Atkinson once said " I have never criticised anybody before and I am not going to change because of that prat"
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: airsbufc on April 11, 2014, 07:17:54 PM: I don't come on here all that often but have always been a Boston fan who goes to almost every home game! Most topics on here are great and its really interesting to hear fellow fans opinions etc. I have to say though that Scouse Pilgrim is an utter prick! Get a life you sad loser! Why do you even support the club?? Please go support another team!
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Cavalier on April 11, 2014, 07:23:18 PM: Quote from: airsbufc on April 11, 2014, 07:17:54 PM
I don't come on here all that often but have always been a Boston fan who goes to almost every home game! Most topics on here are great and its really interesting to hear fellow fans opinions etc. I have to say though that Scouse Pilgrim is an utter prick! Get a life you sad loser! Why do you even support the club?? Please go support another team!

Just reply "Ban him" to get your vote counted
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: airsbufc on April 11, 2014, 07:24:08 PM: Already done it mate.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: father Ted on April 11, 2014, 09:04:38 PM: Keep the Boy Isaac
At least his posts , though booze fuelled I would guess , aren't yawn inducing like some more 'worthy' posters on here .
I have more pressing matters to lose sleep over than his take on BUFC .
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Myleftfoot on April 11, 2014, 09:05:02 PM: SP still one of my all time favourite patter personalities. As seen on http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/pilgrims.html

"Lapsed United fan from the early 70s when the NPL was dominated by the Pilgrims. Born again in the rain at Hayes when the club achieved a memorable and long overdue promotion to the Football League. What a fantastic set of fans both home and away especially for a smallish market town such as Boston. Would be good to top 5000 attendance on a regular basis at York Street. Let's get more fans in with some clever and innovative marketing please! Highlight to 02/03 season: several spring to mind but last minute winner at home to Scunthorpe was very enjoyable as was away win at Cambridge. Goosebump moment: hanging on to 3-3 draw to Wrexham (without doubt the best side in the 3rd division); and Bazza blatantly (?) handling the ball outside the area. Goal of the season: Neil Redfearn's 25 yard free kick at Leyton Orient. Four points head start this season. Let's get stuck in chaps!" From Pilgrims' Fans on the Net. I assume these are one and the same person?

Have you seen my old entry? 8)
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: nikko on April 11, 2014, 09:08:54 PM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Constant Lurker on April 11, 2014, 10:20:52 PM: Quote from: Scouse Pilgrim on April 11, 2014, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: Constant Lurker on April 10, 2014, 11:44:23 PM

Probably the first & last post.

Let's hope so as you're clearly DG's shoe shine boy :-*

To call me a "shoe shine boy" at 44 years old would suggest the shit that you speak is QED.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: sister soo on April 11, 2014, 11:09:04 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: aggy on April 12, 2014, 08:22:22 AM: Banning him will only bolster his deluded Zorro complex!

Just ignore his drivel.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Seenbetter on April 12, 2014, 09:05:03 AM: Ban him or not Aggy.
I think this election will be like voting for an MP. Apathy will win through and the wrong person wins the seat.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Gus on April 12, 2014, 09:28:09 AM: Oh all right.

BAN HIM!!!!!
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Shoddys Lane on April 12, 2014, 09:56:48 AM: Quote from: Myleftfoot on April 11, 2014, 09:05:02 PM
SP still one of my all time favourite patter personalities. As seen on http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/pilgrims.html

Have you seen my old entry? 8)

Oh yes. I have seen it. I often peruse it in a vengeful moment and wonder if I should stop the clock. 8)
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: aggy on April 12, 2014, 11:13:49 AM: Quote from: Seeingbetter on April 12, 2014, 09:05:03 AM
Ban him or not Aggy.
I think this election will be like voting for an MP. Apathy will win through and the wrong person wins the seat.

i am not going to defend the toss pot as he is as welcome as dog shit on my shoe. But as with dog shit I can see it and chose to avoid it.

A witch hunt will only give him the glory of revelling in his own unpopularity, who knows he may even get his sexual thrill from it. So NO I will not call for the twat to be banned.

As N40 says - ignore him & cut off his oxygen.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: CRANWELL PILGRIM on April 12, 2014, 08:57:09 PM: Ban him. We don't need his obsessive negativity.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Burton Pilgrim on April 12, 2014, 10:24:45 PM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: abully on April 13, 2014, 08:57:16 AM: ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Chelsea on April 13, 2014, 09:13:59 AM: Ban it
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: nikko on April 13, 2014, 10:13:02 AM: ban him...
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Poros on April 13, 2014, 10:55:20 AM: You lot are playing directly into his hands. Just ignore everything.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Shoddys Lane on April 13, 2014, 11:32:44 AM: When the baying pack have got their way and tasted blood, what next? Ban anyone who posts a negative comment? Ban anyone who posts but does not attend any or few games? Ban anyone who has a blue front door? Discover what books other fans read and then go round mob handed and burn the books because their taste in literature is not acceptable? A dangerous game is being played, ignore them Ken. :(
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Tash on April 13, 2014, 07:21:59 PM: Quote from: Shoddys Lane on April 13, 2014, 11:32:44 AM
When the baying pack have got their way and tasted blood, what next? Ban anyone who posts a negative comment? Ban anyone who posts but does not attend any or few games? Ban anyone who has a blue front door? Discover what books other fans read and then go round mob handed and burn the books because their taste in literature is not acceptable? A dangerous game is being played, ignore them Ken. :(
No ban the troll for hi jacking so many threads. I have no problem if he makes a comment pertinent to the thread, or if he starts a thread (you don't have to read them).
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Shoddys Lane on April 13, 2014, 07:45:25 PM: Quite right. No one has to read them.
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scots Pilgrim on April 13, 2014, 11:17:03 PM: Let him stay
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 14, 2014, 09:58:26 AM: Does anyone really think SP gives a t#ss on whether there is a ban or not? :-*

What is very revealing of those so keen to impose a ban is how very close we would be to having a fascist state should enough of them get elected to power.

An interesting social experiment Ken and to be frank not very surprising - sadly! :'(
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 14, 2014, 02:00:11 PM: And one more thing - if BUFC were lingering in the relegation zone you can bet your grandma/grandpa that a lot of so called fans would be asking for blood and any excuse would be used including the fact that DG is a convicted fraudster.

Never known such a fickle fan base! :bunny
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Lord Lucan on April 30, 2014, 03:48:41 PM: BAN HIM
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Scouse Pilgrim on April 30, 2014, 05:07:27 PM: Quote from: Lord Lucan on April 30, 2014, 03:48:41 PM
BAN HIM

Have you not voted already Mr Lordy-pants? :bunny
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: B Grimes on May 01, 2014, 07:51:43 AM: I think he is looking a bigger Pratt with each day that passes, but to be honest he does have a point in respect of comments made generally. Whilst his agenda borders on the obsessive and is now boring the pants off all of us. If one goes back a years or so and see the vitriol and personal comments aimed at Drury they were a lot lot worse than any of the campaign of crap dragged on and one by this numpty
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Dave H on May 01, 2014, 10:12:40 PM: Ban him
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: truthsayer on May 01, 2014, 10:24:57 PM: I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend your right to say it.

Enough said. Shall we move on?

TS
Title: Re: Why United gave Greene a two-year deal
Post by: Bostonshire on May 01, 2014, 10:59:39 PM: Just do what the club does when he bombards there email box.............. Have a good laugh at them just before it gets deleted ;)