Pilgrims' Patter

The Forum => The B-Ark => Topic started by: Bunyan on March 14, 2013, 10:37:00 AM

Title: Silk returns
Post by: Bunyan on March 14, 2013, 10:37:00 AM
With Reeds return along with Silk (see O/S) seems that common sense has finally found its way back to YS. Well done DG.
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Tash on March 14, 2013, 10:47:06 AM
Ditto that, experience and quality.
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: miele on March 14, 2013, 12:17:26 PM
HAS  D.G. moved stainfield C/MID perminently??
and silk to cover were ever at the back??
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: lonegunman on March 14, 2013, 12:28:45 PM
There i was thinking that the lad had been released on the chairmans orders due to the budget. Seems like i was mistaken, so, if it wasn't the chairman, who i wonder was the brains behind it?  ;)

check the grassy knoll and the chips and curry  :bunny
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Seenbetter on March 14, 2013, 01:03:23 PM
Glad he is back. Shouldn't have gone in the first place, that was poor judgement.
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Deeping Pilgrim on March 14, 2013, 05:11:03 PM
I see Jordan Smith has been loaned out to Grantham.  I'm not surprised by that, he was talked up by GD but failed to live to the hype.  He will probably be the first one out of the door at the end of the season.
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: kingofnaves on March 14, 2013, 05:15:12 PM
There i was thinking that the lad had been released on the chairmans orders due to the budget. Seems like i was mistaken, so, if it wasn't the chairman, who i wonder was the brains behind it?  ;)

check the grassy knoll and the chips and curry  :bunny
wonder what the truth about Jellyman is?
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Bostonshire on March 14, 2013, 05:35:23 PM
Don't know but cant say im to bothered now, GD gone so its past. pleased silk is back i was never a massive fan of silk but id take him anyday over some of the......... that was signed.

You can add your own words
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: madhos on March 14, 2013, 07:10:29 PM
well done DG should never have left...........silk that is.. ;)
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: porl99 on March 14, 2013, 08:01:01 PM

[/quote]wonder what the truth about Jellyman is?
[/quote]

I bumped into Gareth at a shopping centre in Peterborough a fortnight ago, and although I didn't want to pester him too much, did ask him this.  His response was that the manager 'did a few things that he didn't agree with'.  So there you are.  He also looked very tired with his new baby!
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Seenbetter on March 14, 2013, 08:50:54 PM
Always thought that most of the players that left during the old regime did so because they could see it would all end in tears with the manager at that time, and could you blame them.
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on March 14, 2013, 08:56:35 PM

wonder what the truth about Jellyman is?
[/quote]

I bumped into Gareth at a shopping centre in Peterborough a fortnight ago, and although I didn't want to pester him too much, did ask him this.  His response was that the manager 'did a few things that he didn't agree with'.  So there you are.  He also looked very tired with his new baby!
[/quote]

At the time however we were told GD was a double hard b*****d and the players who left needed to because they were taking us for a ride.  Good managers motivate and coach.  The revoliving door only works if you have money to throw at it.  I feel Greene is more likely to work the way we need to work.  It took two games for me to work out Drury was hot air and no substance. 
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: York Street Pilgrim on March 14, 2013, 10:10:22 PM
Glad to see Silk back but flipping heck - he'll soon have had more spells with the club than Mickey Nuttell!
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Timmy on March 15, 2013, 12:28:28 AM
Good news, a quality player who should never have been released by a manager who could not seem to handle higher profile players.
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: York Street Pilgrim on March 15, 2013, 06:52:33 AM

At least the club saved some money through not having to pay Silk whilst he was suspended for the three matches. It's probably the best thing Dreary actually did for the club!
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Steelihat on March 15, 2013, 08:57:05 AM

At least the club saved some money through not having to pay Silk whilst he was suspended for the three matches. It's probably the best thing Dreary actually did for the club!

...well apart from his pay-off to cancel his contract
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: BosLeake on March 15, 2013, 09:37:09 AM

At least the club saved some money through not having to pay Silk whilst he was suspended for the three matches. It's probably the best thing Dreary actually did for the club!

...well apart from his pay-off to cancel his contract

Was he on a contract? ???
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Pilgrim86 on March 15, 2013, 09:48:15 AM

At least the club saved some money through not having to pay Silk whilst he was suspended for the three matches. It's probably the best thing Dreary actually did for the club!

...well apart from his pay-off to cancel his contract
Not all our players are on contracts, as you should well know...
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Bostonshire on March 15, 2013, 04:05:41 PM
Silk was not on contract.
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: wismo on March 15, 2013, 04:08:15 PM
Will he train on a thursday now then?
Title: Re: Silk returns
Post by: Bostonshire on March 15, 2013, 04:12:41 PM
Will he train on a thursday now then?

He did last night. Maybe it was an  excuse used  to justify his release, who knows?