Pilgrims' Patter

The Forum => The B-Ark => Topic started by: father Ted on September 04, 2009, 04:15:03 PM

Title: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 04, 2009, 04:15:03 PM
 Another  ' village '   team  we have yet to beat  ..
     Classic juxtaposition of  Ground - Tesco - Station (Burscough Bridge) so should cater for most needs ..
        Not tacked on to some mucky metropolis .. quite pleasant in its way .
          Not sure of the pubs .. last away we went in the Social Club .. the Boston brass were in there till K O .
           You can see the pitch from in  there ..never sure of the rules about that ..
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on September 04, 2009, 08:33:06 PM
There is a pub by the river not far from the ground, run by a South African, twas ok last time we went (apart from the Rugger being on in there)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 05, 2009, 11:19:02 AM
 Raining in area . .i'll be late . .
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: wez33 on September 05, 2009, 02:47:25 PM
interesting to see both swoz and danny playing at same time,  could be a good choice maybe?
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Richie..p on September 05, 2009, 02:50:32 PM
at a guess after seeing the line up for Boston expect to get a sore neck after looking up alot. I can't imagine the ball going to feet much this afternoon. As long as we win I suppose.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 05, 2009, 03:07:40 PM
YEA 433  .? not there til 1525 . .hope we are 2  up .  .by then . . . .is Newsh benched . .p? Is Foxy about . .?
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Boo on September 05, 2009, 03:13:23 PM
1-0 up
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 05, 2009, 03:40:28 PM
CLARKI e Told off 4 instructing on Touchline .
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: deano on September 05, 2009, 03:59:11 PM
happy days mcfraud 2 0 down as well
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Boo on September 05, 2009, 04:09:06 PM
1-1 bugger
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Ken Fox on September 05, 2009, 04:10:26 PM
Bugger, they just equalised.

Here's a pic from the first half.

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc1.jpg)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Boo on September 05, 2009, 04:12:16 PM
2-1 down
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Adam on September 05, 2009, 04:14:38 PM
3-1? What's happening? Cheeky tinpot sods.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: bufc40 on September 05, 2009, 04:19:33 PM
oh dear.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: doc on September 05, 2009, 04:19:49 PM
WTF?????
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 05, 2009, 04:21:31 PM
 Disastrous . . EVANS Didn't appear to  move 4 any of goals . .
   Burscough wingers are on song again . . Clarke on  for Suarez .
     Their wingers are destroying us . .
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: deano on September 05, 2009, 04:22:23 PM
3-4 it will be then
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Bostonshire on September 05, 2009, 04:50:23 PM
What makes a good team, the ability to lose take it on the chin and bounce back in the next game.so now we should get to see the real boston
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: PompeyPilgrim on September 05, 2009, 04:56:34 PM
Damn right there Bostonshire; lets se a good reply in the next game.  We've lost; lets move on...  Up the Pilgrims!
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: O CHO MEALLT on September 05, 2009, 05:22:50 PM
I suppose it's the manner of defeat that's most disappointing.How did we concede 3 in 5 minutes when  the defence has looked strong?I guess we had to lose sometime,you can't expect to win away every time.First game i've missed this season,so i guess we'll have to wait for those who went to give us the details.Let's hope we get the right reaction Tuesday night.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: oxo on September 05, 2009, 05:30:43 PM
Lets put it firmly behind us and get down to York Street on Tuesday and urge the lads on to victory.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Ken Fox on September 05, 2009, 05:31:45 PM
Another pic.

More to follow after I've sorted out the Prediction League.

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc2.jpg)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Stumpy on September 05, 2009, 05:35:40 PM
Even the best teams lose, no team has the divine right to win as a matter of right.

Luton are fancied to waltz through the Blue Square Premier but after a quick fire start they have been brought down to earth.

Its good that there is a match on Tuesday for the players to show their qualities and get a run going again and the management will have something to focus the players minds on for a good few games.

Bring on Tuesday
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 05, 2009, 06:14:30 PM
Bit of a strange result really ..
 From my view in their mainstand I found the performance of Tom Evans  rather curious in the 2nd half..
  He did n't seem to make an efort to dive for any of the goals ,,there were 2 medium range eforts and one free kick ..
   Then he attempted to act as a sweeper by trapping and short passing the ball ..which led to some confusion  to say the least ..
   Maybe he was carrying an injury..
      It has to be said at that time the defence seemed to play too square ..was being beaten for pace and brawn  too often ..
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Ken Fox on September 05, 2009, 06:18:28 PM
Some more pics. More to follow when I've had a bit of tea.

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc3.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc4.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc5.jpg)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: faraway pilgrim on September 05, 2009, 07:32:32 PM
Any positives anyone, who played well? afterall we were winning at h/time. i need cheering up me takeaways gonna be a hour
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: BostonGoals on September 05, 2009, 07:35:52 PM
There were some massive wins today.

Cambridge 7-0 Forest Green
Barrow 1-6 Rushden
Droylsden 7-1 Stafford
Port Vale 4-0 Grimsby (what a surprise)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Ken Fox on September 05, 2009, 07:45:23 PM
More pics, more to follow...

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc6.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc7.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc8.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc9.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc10.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc11.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc12.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc13.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc14.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc15.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc16.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc17.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc18.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc19.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc20.jpg)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 05, 2009, 07:48:43 PM
 Not sure I could tell U fp.. I arrived late when we were 1-0 up..
   Maybe Culli, s injury had a bearing..but Woody was also increasingly struggling to keep up ..
    Maybe some one could report what the mana gers made of it .. as I am out of range of Radio Lincs..
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Ken Fox on September 05, 2009, 08:37:15 PM
Last set of pics probably...

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc21.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc22.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc23.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc24.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc25.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc26.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc27.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc28.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc29.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc30.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc31.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc32.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc33.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc34.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc35.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc36.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc37.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc38.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc39.jpg)

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc40.jpg)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Ken Fox on September 05, 2009, 09:02:30 PM
Ooops, forgot one.  ;D

(http://www.bufc.drfox.org.uk/bursc41.jpg)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: woad_pilgrim on September 05, 2009, 09:10:04 PM
Worst performance of the season by a mile. Thought the game was spoiled by the wind and some over-fussy officiating making it hard for either team to get any passage of play. Despite being a goal up we where poor first half and goal apart didn't really create anything. In spite of this still fancied us to take the points as Burscough had been slightly worse.

Not sure what their manager said at half time but they came out second half and took us apart somewhat. After some strong defensive performances up until today can hardly believe what happened, we looked like we'd concede every time they went forward. Personally think Evans should of saved all 3 of their goals and would be very surprised if Butcher doesn't get a run out Tuesday. Wood and Cully both looked jaded and Liam Parker had a bit of a mare. Sleath in the middle had a poor game by his standards and up front...well apart from the goal only Sleath late on forced a save from their keeper.

Think the managers will have learned a lot from today the main thing being not to play the 2 big strikers together. We had absolutely no penetration al all. As has been said it's how a team bounces back from a defeat that shows how good it is so let's hope we can get that first home win Tuesday.

Too many players had an off day together today for us to get anything out of the game so I would say that it was the right result. That's not taking anything away from Burscough who worked hard all game and eventually got their rewards. For me though we have already beaten better teams this season so just put it down to 1 of them days. I would think there will be several changes for Tuesday (if it where me)

GK: Butcher
RB: Cullingworth
CB: Canners
CB: Pearson (if fit)
LB: Jackson
CM: Camm
RM: Chruch
LM: Kennedy
RF: Cotton
CF: Clarke
LF: Newsham

I would go with this as there where a lot of players who looked tired today and I think a rest would do some of them good, would also show how good the squad is.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Mickey Nuttells Hair on September 05, 2009, 09:25:07 PM
That was the reaction that summed up the day really Ken!
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Tash on September 05, 2009, 09:36:50 PM
That was the reaction that summed up the day really Ken!

I thought you were trying to stop your mate nicking your hair piece  :D
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: sparks on September 05, 2009, 10:26:45 PM



   The pairing of Danny and Mikel just didn't work for me without the support of natural
   wingers who would and could of got to the byeline and put balls into the box for the
   big men to feed off, then push Churchy and Sleathy up there to pick up the bits.

   A lot of under acheivers today at Victoria Park, Tuesdays game cannot come quick
   enough to put this result to bed.......... long season still, a hell of a lot to play for and
   this squad is far better than todays result suggests. Changes I would assume will be
   made for the visit of Matlock Town before the possibility of complacency starts to
   creep in amongst a talented bunch of players..................
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 05, 2009, 10:57:41 PM
 So it s back to 442..?
   And we need another winger ?
   ( Wingers could tackle back ,,that doesn't easily happen with 433.)
    To day our central midfield got largely bypassed in 2nd half..don't wish that to happen again.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: BUFC Loyal on September 05, 2009, 11:11:07 PM
onwards too tuesday ' bouncebackabilty' factor will have too come in too affect

felt we never really looked our best today even at 1 up although cannot fault any of the lads on effort shown , just things did'nt go our way today

think their will be changes made on tuesday although not as many as maybe expected, think alot of these lads will wanna get this result out of their system , they did'nt look happy at all best way too do that will be getting a good result tuesday night, and we don't wanna be tinkering too much , would do no good for anyone

also remember we have a versitile bunch of players here

no need too panic at all , was going too happen sooner or later

better it happend away , if it was at home the moaning mini's would of had a field day

also really dont like the look of DD & MS up top

think for game on tuesday id go with

Evans

Canners
Pearson ( if fit)
Parker
Cully

Cotton
Chruch
Camm
Kennedy

Davidson
Clarke


Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: BostonGoals on September 06, 2009, 09:44:52 AM
I think the Davidson/Clarke partnership is our best bet, it has worked so far this season.

Im a bit worried about Chris Wood though, in a couple of games he has looked a bit dodgy....
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Stumpie on September 06, 2009, 12:54:10 PM
Clarke & Newsham.. why do we need a big striker on, it just makes us play the long ball all the time
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: colindavy on September 06, 2009, 01:23:36 PM
The first time I've seen the team this season.......hmmmm....not very good today. Two beanpoles up front looked promising but they struggled to get any incisive headers from the long balls kicked up to them from well in our own half.  Second half, Burscough looked fired up and took advantage of the wind behind them, using fast players to take advantage of balls played forward and to feet. Their number seven began looking very threatening and they passed the ball to him regularly. Their first goal was a free kick that ran through the everyone, second goal was squeezed somehow through at the near post, and the third goal was a cross that drifted into the far corner. That was that really, despite our tall forwards being withdrawn.

Oh well, perhaps I jinxed them.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: chris47 on September 06, 2009, 01:35:09 PM
In a strange kind of way I am actually relieved we lost today. The fact that we were unbeaten left me waiting for the first defeat to happen.

Now its done lets hope it does not happen very often. I will not be able to make the Tuesday game - so they should do well.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: wez33 on September 06, 2009, 02:20:02 PM
Disapointed to have lost but i think it was a one off for now some players where having problems out there and id expect to see changes

gk: evans
rb: woody
cb: pearson
cb:canners
lb: cully
cm:Church
cm: Sleath
cm: Camm
cf: cotton
cf: Newsham
cf: Clarke
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: father Ted on September 06, 2009, 03:47:24 PM
 Agree Newsham and Clarke up front , and Pearson needs a game def .
  Unsure about full backs mooted .. not as impressed with Culli as some..widewise any way .
    So that leaves 2 beanies benched ..if we could trade say Suarez .. who would U add to the squad ??
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Poros on September 06, 2009, 04:22:19 PM
No speaka da english?
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Seenbetter on September 06, 2009, 05:12:55 PM
Please correct me if I'm wrong, and it's all good for debate, didn't a little slip of a lad help preserve our dignity towards the end of last season by scoring goals for us. I personally think that tall players aren't as necessary as is often made out. I agree that they can be useful for crosses or flicking on situations but they have to be more useful than that. Davidson surprised me with his good ground work for such a tall feller but sometimes he tries to take on too many and loses the ball and his first touch can let him down.
Anyway we had to lose a game sooner or later and RS on the radio said it was just one of those days. So, roll on Tuesday and hopefully to get back in winning ways. I still think there is better to come.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: sshh u no hoo on September 06, 2009, 06:36:48 PM
Now that could start a fascinating debate, two biggies? One biggie and a lillt'un? or two little'uns?

Apart from Drogba and Anelka, (who didn't play too  much together last year) two great six foot players but hardly the stereotype lummox of a centre forward most biggies get labelled with

In years gone by we had, and just to start with a few
Toshack & Keegan
Greaves & Gilzean
Smith & Wright

Currently we have.....
Adebayor and Tevez/Robinho
Crouch & Defoe 
Berbatov & Rooney

There is no doubt about it that over the last few years, there has been an explosion of smaller nippy strikers, Johnson, Cole, Owen, Defoe, Rooney, Eduardo, Torres, keane, Tevez, Robinho and the like, backed up by a posse of sprinters ETO, Henry, Anelka and the like

the biggies seem to find refuge at those teams with a reputation for shall we say direct up and at them style, and for evidence examine the front men of Bolton, Blackburn, Stoke, Birmingham, Sunderland and the likes

Not that it means bugger all for us, but a fascinating point that could take up many hours in pubs and coach trips travelling to games thats for sure

For me? One biggie one and one little'un
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: howmanynames2pick on September 06, 2009, 07:15:04 PM
For me? One biggie one and one little'un

well thats better than none and Hitler only had one (allegedly)
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Pilgrim21 on September 06, 2009, 07:47:10 PM
For me? One biggie one and one little'un

well thats better than none and Hitler only had one (allegedly)

 :D :D :D now that's funny :D :D :D
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Seenbetter on September 07, 2009, 07:53:39 AM
Isn't this forum great. We can begin with something that could develope our football intellectuality and within minutes it's reduced to a load of bo**ocks. Perhaps if, unlike Hitler, we had two on Saturday our lot could have gone off to some remote part of the pitch and played with themselves.
I suppose having a bigun and a littleun makes sense. Two biguns at the same time might encourage too much of the long high ball. When we have played football on the ground it's looked pretty good.
Anyway, come on you black n ambers. Still chuffed with the way things are going at the club and good to see SnH getting great support from everyone on here.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on September 07, 2009, 07:59:36 AM
What's with the scaffold terrace, that's new since last time went?
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Seenbetter on September 07, 2009, 08:10:11 AM
"I'm disinclined to acquiesce to your request". Knew I had heared it somewhere and on Saturday watched The Black Pearl thingy on tele and heared it again. Perhaps we could all adopt quotes. I might have "two biguns or a littleun and a bigun, that is the question".
Scaffolding ?. No idea.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on September 07, 2009, 05:54:10 PM
"I'm disinclined to acquiesce to your request". Knew I had heared it somewhere and on Saturday watched The Black Pearl thingy on tele and heared it again. Perhaps we could all adopt quotes. I might have "two biguns or a littleun and a bigun, that is the question".
Scaffolding ?. No idea.

Lord Cutler Beckett is the captain of the good ship endeavour in said film (although I thought it was at a worlds end,)

Sadly it is only a forum name and I'm nothing like the said good lord "Haughty, cultured, and sophisticated, it is Beckett's very arrogance which leads him to his death."

Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Seenbetter on September 07, 2009, 08:14:19 PM
I think you must be horty, culchered and sofistikated cos I can't even spell em.
Title: Re: v Burscough
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on September 07, 2009, 08:25:17 PM
Cmd C, Cmd V from Wikipedia, jobs a gud un! ;D