But would anyone have supported a JR if the answer had been the other way?
This is exactly why I find discussing the entire subject now pointless.
There would not have been a JR as we would not have been looking to invoke A50 as we would have voted remain!
THE POINT of the JR is not to stop leaving, thats done - decided - literally nobody is saying change it. The issue, the JR, is to stop a quick reactionary exit which is ill thought out and not properly considered. IF the PMs plan (and its not even the governments or the ministers plan as non of them agree) is so good why can it not be debated, voted on, in the commons.
WE HAVE TAKEN BACK CONTROL remember, let's use it
:dan