Pilgrims' Patter

The Forum => The B-Ark => Topic started by: kingofnaves on December 02, 2013, 08:41:55 PM

Title: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: kingofnaves on December 02, 2013, 08:41:55 PM
Rumoured they could be throen out of the Vase! Anybody know if this is true?
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: joshb on December 02, 2013, 08:45:12 PM
Read the same things as you... I heard the bloke says 'a watertight source'
What is it about these tinpot overspending outfits in Lincolnshire cheating?
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: green hats mate on December 02, 2013, 09:22:10 PM
Will be confirmed by FA tomorrow .
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Steelihat on December 02, 2013, 09:35:56 PM
Read the same things as you... I heard the bloke says 'a watertight source'
What is it about these tinpot overspending outfits in Lincolnshire cheating?

Glass houses?
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: kingofnaves on December 02, 2013, 09:38:55 PM
Glass houses! Probably get your crowd in my greenhouse!
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Lord Cutler Knobhead on December 02, 2013, 10:29:11 PM
Read the same things as you... I heard the bloke says 'a watertight source'
What is it about these tinpot overspending outfits in Lincolnshire cheating?

Glass houses?

Are you throwing stones too?  :P
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Burgh Boy on December 02, 2013, 11:23:45 PM
http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/sport/football/breaking-news-tulips-to-be-expelled-from-fa-vase-1-5723409

Looks like this is the case
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Pilgrim86 on December 03, 2013, 01:14:13 AM
Read the same things as you... I heard the bloke says 'a watertight source'
What is it about these tinpot overspending outfits in Lincolnshire cheating?

Glass houses?
There's a difference between overspending on the playing budget (Trinity, Spalding) and overspending because your overheads are huge (us).
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: leicester pilgrim on December 03, 2013, 07:17:01 AM
Is Peter Bore still dual-registered with us and Spalding? He seems to have disappeared from our official site completely, so is he now solely a tulip?
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: B Grimes on December 03, 2013, 08:33:58 AM
Didn't Spalding also have three points deducted last year for a similar offence?
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Keynsham Pilgrim on December 03, 2013, 01:28:10 PM
Pilgrim86, i believe that Steelihat may be referring to the 2001/02 campaign as opposed to any overheads we currently have
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Pete Brooksbank on December 03, 2013, 02:11:50 PM
"More on this huge story when we have it."

Ha!

Are Spalding really going to waste everyone's time and appeal?
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Ernie100 on December 03, 2013, 02:12:44 PM
Spalding have just set a new UCL record of 17 games without defeat and yet only 154 souls went to watch them achieve this.   Surely their "sugar daddy" will get fed up sooner rather than later.
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Ken Fox on December 03, 2013, 03:47:35 PM
Spalding have just set a new UCL record of 17 games without defeat and yet only 154 souls went to watch them achieve this.   Surely their "sugar daddy" will get fed up sooner rather than later.

It's slightly more impressive than 17 games without defeat - they have won all their 17 games in the UCL so far this season. Not too surprising considering the strength of their squad.
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Artemis on December 05, 2013, 09:12:23 AM
Spalding have just set a new UCL record of 17 games without defeat and yet only 154 souls went to watch them achieve this.   Surely their "sugar daddy" will get fed up sooner rather than later.
Isn't their so called "sugar daddy"  the manager?

I don't understand these "rich" individuals throwing cash at football clubs hoping to rise up the leagues when the team football club they "take over"  has never had much of a following.   In the Spalding situation, its the Council who own the ground (as far as I know), whereas when Swann took over at Gainsborough he had his eyes on their ground but pity he didnt do his homework because he may have gone elsewhere because the Blues Club had no intention of selling their ground.
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Ernie100 on December 05, 2013, 01:42:23 PM
Apparently for playing an unregistered/or serving a ban from a previous club, player, they have appealed.
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Artemis on December 05, 2013, 07:01:55 PM
They have lost their appeal.
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Winging It on December 06, 2013, 09:16:39 PM
The player they signed signed for them under one name but previously played for the other team under another. and spalding didn't know about this.  its not the first time players have done this, and some, if not most of the blame lies with him i would say.  its like us going out and accidentally and unknown to us bought some famous boston fake vodka.  :bunny
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: kingofnaves on December 06, 2013, 10:37:25 PM
The player they signed signed for them under one name but previously played for the other team under another. and spalding didn't know about this.  its not the first time players have done this, and some, if not most of the blame lies with him i would say.  its like us going out and accidentally and unknown to us bought some famous boston fake vodka.  :bunny
we did that in the Boston Saturday League once ;D
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Ernie100 on December 07, 2013, 12:41:40 PM
wot! bought fake vodka, or played a player under a different name?
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: green hats mate on December 07, 2013, 12:45:26 PM
wot! bought fake vodka, or played a player under a different name?

Both I would think Ernie !!!!!!
Title: Re: Spalding naughty boys?
Post by: Fairfax on December 07, 2013, 02:15:52 PM
The FA is like The Admiralty in the eighteenth century. The rule of law must be upheld and to Hell with justice.