Author Topic: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’  (Read 4730 times)

Shoddys Lane

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
    • View Profile
‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« on: July 14, 2012, 01:08:41 PM »
Published on Saturday 14 July 2012 11:57  Standard

DAVID Newton has lifted the lid on the financial meltdown facing Boston United when he took over the club.

And the Pilgrims’ chairman has also spoken out against other football bosses who have put paid to Conference League plans to introduce financial fair play in a revealing fans’ forum at the Sports Bar last Wednesday.

Last week, Newton and vice-chairman Neil Kempster celebrated the fifth anniversary of their takeover of the Pilgrims.

Before their intervention, United looked set for liquidation.

Former owner Jon Sotnick had jumped ship, leaving Jim Rodwell to take over as chairman of the cash-strapped club.

The Pilgrims entered into a Company Voluntary Agreement as they were relegated from the Football League.

With the fans turning against him, manager Steve Evans left for Crawley Town and took assistant Paul Rayner with him.

The players and staff were owed months-worth of wages and it seemed the only way to go was bust.

In a bid to save United, general manager John Blackwell and former Leicester City chief executive Barrie Pierpoint held a public meeting on Father’s Day, 2007.

It was there that Newton, attending as his property development company Chestnut Homes were the club’s main shirt sponsor, felt he had to step in.

But little did he know what mess he and Kempster were inheriting.

“When we came here it was a disaster zone,” Newton said.

“It was totally fragmented, there was no cohesion and the club just blew loads of money trying to be successful.

“They’d blown it and had lost all respect in the football world. It was awful.

“It was rubbish what we inherited.

“There were debts of £3 million at the club.”

Dutifully, Newton and Kempster began attempting to turn things around.

They attended league meetings and visited other clubs on away days, slowly beginning to instil faith in other non-league clubs that Boston United was moving away from its dark recent past.

This wasn’t a charm offensive, this was just helped by the duo’s motto of ‘doing things properly’.

But the hard work wasn’t on the road, it was at home.

With different sections of the club posted at different offices around town, Newton and Kempster – who has been tasked with making the community side of the club a success – began building the Pilgrims as a successful brand.

“The best thing (about those five years) is seeing people work hard to help pull this club back together,” continued Newton, acknowledging the club’s phoenix-like rise has been a team effort.

Things are a lot better these days, but they are still far from perfect.

At present, the club continues to operate at a loss.

The 2010-11 financial year, the latest figures available, showed a loss of £190,000.

That number is shrinking each year, but Newton acknowledges his business interests cannot continue propping the club up for years to come.

“We’ve cut the playing budget for this season,” he added.

“We have to get closer to the break-even point, we can’t keep putting money in.

“Jason (Lee, manager) has also taken a pay cut as well – but we’ve still got a budget to be competitive.”

A strong fanbase, advertising and sponsorship and additional community schemes means money still comes into the club, although overheads remain high.

With this in mind, Newton predicts the Pilgrims’ playing budget is one of the Blue Square Bet North’s top five.

This, perhaps, justifies his 
demands that the Pilgrims 
finish within the play-off places this season.

But as Newton and Kempster attempt to bring United back into the black, they feel the playing field remains uneven.

At the Blue Square Bet annual meeting at Celtic Manor last month, the Conference League attempted to bring in a rule forbidding directors putting loans into football clubs.

This attempt at financial fair play would mean all investment made into clubs would not be recouped.

However, a number of clubs – led by ex-Grimsby Town chairman John Fenty – spoke out against the proposals and vetoed the motion.

An unimpressed Newton added: “Mr Fenty supported the vote. He wants to continue sticking money into a football club that is not sustainable.

“Football people need to live in the real world.

“These are tough times and we have to be sensible with our approach to clubs.

“This is just not effective for everybody.”

And there was also a mention for league rivals Gainsborough Trinity, who have spent big in recent years.

Despite luring Jamie Yates and Shane Clarke away from York Street, Trinity failed to win the first promotion in the club’s history last season, losing to Nuneaton in the play-off final.

And it seems their approach has changed this term.

Newton added: “Gainsborough have appeared to have stopped chucking money at it by bringing in players from a lower level.

“They’ve probably learnt a bit of a lesson already.

“We haven’t got the money to do that and even if we did we wouldn’t.

“It can’t guarantee you are successful.

“A club is still a business and you’ve got to run it like one to be successful.”

Poros

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
Re: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2012, 01:47:53 PM »
Shoddy, what are you doing? You will only set Rissole Rooster off  again on another pointless rant!

lonegunman

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 861
    • View Profile
Re: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2012, 05:10:44 PM »
Boy am i pleased we have a Chairman like DN in charge. We might not have the best players, we might not win the most games but we have a club.
Yes i know i'll get slated for saying that but i don't care, i'd sooner have DN in charge than some numpty like Fenty was at Grimsby.

check the grassy knoll and the chips and curry  :bunny
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.
Oscar Wilde
When Confronted By A Difficult Problem, You Can Solve It More Easily By Reducing It To The Question, "How Would The Lone Ranger Have Handled This?

noughtyforties

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
  • Making a stand against apologists since 2004
    • View Profile
Re: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2012, 07:54:37 PM »
I think you'll be hard pressed to find any BUFC fan that thinks different.

All we need now is a manager who can get a winning team out on the field or all Dave's work will be in vain.

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2012, 08:52:09 PM »
And Dave thinks he may have that manager.!

Scouse Pilgrim

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
    • View Profile
Re: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2012, 01:30:42 PM »
Well thanks for that Dave. It has taken you 5 years to spill errr.... well virtually nothing!

I could have told you the same.

A few warning signs Dave, viz.,

The late filing of company accounts,

the secrecy behind the membership of the consortium,

high level resignations with crap excuses,

lack of adequate record keeping,

threats of legal action,

closure of websites,

a list of court orders as long as you arm for bad debts,

using the club's website to personally smear named individuals,

common assault,

class A drugs,  

previous fraud and concealment.

Sotnick spoke of his business acumen (and he still does) when he is nothing more than a conman. Evans left for Crawley not because fans were against him - a large tranche had been against him since he was reappointed, he left because the cupboard was bare - £3 million bare!  And I will wager my grandmother that old Steve was not one of the staff who was not paid for several months.  

You say you inherited rubbish - so what sort of due diligence did you carry out? I remember you telling us all you were doing this.  And how can we call your  fit and proper if you are clueless and to boot still running at an annual loss??. So rather than criticise John Fenty, why don't you write off the loans you have made to BUFC - that would be financial fair play would it not?  

Would that be "DOING THINGS PROPERLY"?

How much have you loaned Dave? Half a million, more?

Who is going to want to take on the club when you hang up your cement mixer? - in this respect you are little better than Sotnick just your PR is more honed.


Finally, are you really  trying to tell us to believe that you stepped in on the day of the Pierrepoint presentation just because you were  the club's main shirt sponsor and felt some sort of duty?  Are you bonkers? Do we look that daft?

Now why don't you tell us the real reason old boy.....?
==========================================================

as Kipling said:


“Let us admit it fairly, as a business people should,
We have had no end of a lesson: it will do us no end of good.

Not on a single issue, or in one direction or twain,
But conclusively, comprehensively, and several times and again,
Were all our most holy illusions knocked higher than Gilderoy’s kite.
We have had a jolly good lesson, and it serves us jolly well right!”



« Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 02:41:59 PM by Scouse Pilgrim »
The B-Ark.  For Boston fans to talk about anything and everything they want to. Including trolls.

BostonGoals

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 846
    • View Profile
Re: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2012, 01:45:14 PM »
Christ, stop trolling

Ed Kandi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1493
    • View Profile
Re: ‘When we came in Boston United was a disaster zone’
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2012, 10:13:07 AM »
So rather than criticise John Fenty, why don't you write off the loans you have made to BUFC - that would be financial fair play would it not?  

Would that be "DOING THINGS PROPERLY"?
==========================================================

as Kipling said:


“Let us admit it fairly, as a business people should,
We have had no end of a rogering: it will do us no end of good.

Not on a single issue, or in one direction or twain,
But conclusively, comprehensively, and several times and again,
Were all our most holy illusions knocked higher than Gilderoy’s kite.
We have had a jolly good rogering, and it serves us jolly well right!”
 :dan





Looks like David Newton attempted to level the playing field only to find Fenty had bulldozed it back to its original gradient.
If the vote had been passed, from now on, anything he had put in would have been written off.
What he's put in so far is enough to keep the club going, there's not many small housebuilders out there who can afford to write off such comparitively large sums without putting their own business at risk IMO.