Author Topic: Court Case. This is Grimsby  (Read 3460 times)

Shoddys Lane

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
    • View Profile
Court Case. This is Grimsby
« on: March 16, 2012, 12:05:54 PM »
JOHN Fenty insists Grimsby Town must move on quickly from yesterday's court case – which found that Boston United must be paid £21,410 over the appointment of managerial duo Rob Scott and Paul Hurst.

The judge, recorder Barnett, sitting at Sheffield County Court, ordered Grimsby Town, Scott and Hurst to pay a total of £10,400 in damages, £10,500 in costs and £510 in interest to Boston United.

    ​

The Pilgrims took Town to court almost exactly a year on from the March 23 appointment of Scott and Hurst as Mariners bosses – two days after they had resigned from York Street.

Recorder Barnett said Boston chairman David Newton gave evidence that could be "relied upon" but criticised Scott and Mr Fenty, acting on behalf of Grimsby Town, of casting a "severe cloud" over their evidence.

This was for refusing to name an agent who acted on behalf of Scott and Hurst in talks with the club. Recorder Barnett said this "undermined their credibility".

Town director Mr Fenty, who was at the time the club's chairman, told the Telegraph: "Naturally we are disappointed considering it is down to the decision of one man when all is said and done.

"He has a lot of information to digest and it clearly came down to the fact we didn't divulge the agent's name. In his words it left a cloud over the case and undermined our credibility.

"This was a black mark against us, but this is what we agreed to do.

"We said we wouldn't name the agent because he did not want his name brought out in this. We have stuck by our guns and we live and die on the back of that."

Mr Fenty, who said Town must also pay their own costs of around £10,000-£12,000, was critical of Mr Newton.

He said: "I think David Newton could have been fairer. We could have had genuine negotiations. He wasn't willing and he put conditions on the managers.

"They felt it was additional conditions over and above their written contract.

"Naturally any football club cannot afford bills of this sort, but we have to find the money and move on.

"We have absolutely no regrets about appointing Rob and Paul.

The club is going in the right direction and, in due course, we will forget this and go on to better things."

Grimsby Town will not be appealing the outcome.

Tony Goor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
    • View Profile
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2012, 12:15:33 PM »
It is no good Mr Fenty criticising Mr Newton.  If he had gone through the proper channels in the first place this would not have cost him and Grimsby Town and their managers more than £34,000 compensation and legal fees.

Football should be run properly, like any other business. Recorder Barnett described Scott, Hurst and Fenty as "unreliable". Enough said.  Pay the money . . . learn the lesson.

Gus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
    • View Profile
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2012, 12:31:19 PM »
Well said, Cuzz.

Fenty is a total dickhead and obviously not very professional. Serves him right.

green hats mate

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
    • View Profile
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2012, 02:04:10 PM »
The curse of the modern game is agents , the fact Fenty refused to reveil the name of the one involved clearly indicates he deserved the big bill he has landed himself with .
This should leave question marks against Fentys integrity and suspicions of him by town fans for many years to come .

Pilgrim86

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5176
    • View Profile
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2012, 02:06:49 PM »
I reckon the way that they haven't named this agent who obviously spoke to S&H before they resigned (hence the interview), has gone against Grimsby in that the blame is on them, and not this unnamed 3rd party.

Tash

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
  • BUFC
    • View Profile
    • Addisons
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2012, 03:00:11 PM »
I reckon the way that they haven't named this agent who obviously spoke to S&H before they resigned (hence the interview), has gone against Grimsby in that the blame is on them, and not this unnamed 3rd party.

If indeed there ever was an agent.
IWJLTSTSPFKARIADASICR

townender3385

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 157
    • View Profile
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2012, 05:03:48 PM »
He sues who he wants,
He sues who he wants
He's David Newton he sues who he wants

dubai camel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2012, 04:02:14 PM »
Justice done.

Couldn't happen to a nicer guy .....


Presumably the FA will be looking into the actions of the club in general and Mr Fenty in particular?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2012, 04:08:02 PM by dubai camel »

Seenbetter

  • Guest
Re: Court Case. This is Grimsby
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2012, 11:40:25 PM »
Agent didnt want to be named, cobblers. If there was an agent involved his evidence would probably have sunk fenty and cost them more. Wouldnt want to do business with the feller, couldnt trust him. If he was right as he claims then he should appeal because he would obviously not be found at fault, I dont think.