Messages

406

The B-Ark / Re: Spencer Weir Daley!!

« on: October 22, 2009, 09:30:30 PM »

I knew you would come back with something like that!  ;o)

Nah you are right to be cautious as it is a big number of clubs BUT lets face facts if we can get him banging in the goals he will help us and himself move onwards and upwards so we BOTH need it to come off where before he could just pick up the pay i guess?

I'm assuming he is now the Patter sponsored player?

407

The B-Ark / Re: Spencer Weir Daley!!

« on: October 22, 2009, 09:23:13 PM »

VERY Surprised, looks a cracking signing.  But can he do it on the pitch?  Let's hope so!

Well done BUFC on getting him in.

408

The B-Ark / Re: Vs Chorley

« on: October 17, 2009, 04:24:29 PM »

3-2 up, Sleath.  Ahhhhhh.

409

The B-Ark / Re: Vs Chorley

« on: October 17, 2009, 04:22:59 PM »

Fearns gets his second, now 2-2.  Hmmmm.

410

The B-Ark / Re: Vs Chorley

« on: October 17, 2009, 03:57:13 PM »

2-1 up, both Danny Davidson.

411

The B-Ark / Re: ELDING

« on: October 15, 2009, 12:47:55 PM »

Till January it seems.  He must be desperate!

412

The B-Ark / Re: NFL Wembley Oct 25th

« on: October 15, 2009, 12:11:06 PM »

Indeed!  Had a cracking time last year and it will be a nice warm up for my trip the following week to NY then onto Vegas.

413

The B-Ark / Re: More money worries

« on: October 10, 2009, 03:30:28 PM »

That as may be but the issue thats been key for long while now is the ground and this increase does not take the piss it steals it.

It clear from this the Malks don't want money they want to be rid of the club and will continue to squeeze till its gone.  Sad, sad day.

Yet more appreciation for David and Neil, what others would carry on in a situation like this?

414

The B-Ark / Re: Vs Bradford PA

« on: September 15, 2009, 12:24:53 PM »

Suarez's job isn't to run the channels - he's the big man in between the two either side of him. He wins more headers than Davidson, but he loses out to Davidson on strength.

I'd also say I think Suarez has slightly better ability with his feet.  A few times now i've seen him collect a ball turn and take one if not two defenders away with him then win a corner/throw.

415

The B-Ark / Re: Vs Bradford PA

« on: September 14, 2009, 10:25:12 PM »

Just got back in.

Deserved a win without any doubt tonight, BPA only threatened with odd attacks, from their forum 'To be honest we did not deserve anything from that'.  We need experience through the middle of the team and its clearly lacking at the back without Canners.  Just look at the goals and in some cases the times that we are conceding them - late on, after we score, in twos or like Burscough threes!!!

Church again for me was excellent and even though I keep saying play Clarke instead of Newsham he keeps knocking them in and today with Clarke.  You have to laugh though if you add up the distance of the last three Newsham goals the yards would not reach double figures.

We are not far away from a very good team but with, in my view, us light by two or three in the squad we are not going to get there.

416

The B-Ark / Re: Away at Lowestoft in the next round of the Cup

« on: September 14, 2009, 01:12:53 PM »

THANK GOD FOR THAT!

I'm in Germany that weekend so I was expecting Ossett (Ocid) away or some other doorstep match.

417

The B-Ark / Re: "FAO Cookie" posting

« on: September 11, 2009, 08:23:21 PM »

'Free speech', 'other issues my dear fellow', for fecks sake.  And people wonder why organisations struggle for volunteers or helpers.

No message was deleted, edited or removed by a mod. 

Can we have McFraud back so there actually IS something worth moaning about?

418

The B-Ark / Re: New Home Shirt

« on: September 11, 2009, 10:18:57 AM »

I'm just extremely gateful that Adam and I got to see England in Germany with a ticket bought at, if memory serves, for a donation to charity at LESS than face-value. Everyone round us at the game had either won theirs in competitions or paid £400 quid!

We were guests of Hyundai.  Or was it Toshiba?

419

The B-Ark / Re: "FAO Cookie" posting

« on: September 11, 2009, 10:17:35 AM »

Mate if this is the only thing we have to worry about currently then I'm a very happy man.  Fact is there are some people busting their balls to get the place off the ground for the benefit of the club and yeah there are always going to be bits that need sorting or changing (something Cookie has shown to take on board and sort from suggestions here) but let's not lose sight of the fact that people who were working for the club probably could not get there a minute before closing as, well, they were working for the club!

For someone to post the thing on here in such detail was, from my point of view, a brilliant demonstration of how some people get annoyed at the most ridiculous things. 

420

The B-Ark / Re: "FAO Cookie" posting

« on: September 10, 2009, 09:47:51 PM »

No.  Someone who had been working for the club had been doing so until A MINUTE past last orders so got a drink.  Perspective please.