Why not accept the fact that you are financially supported by Chestnuts, and be pleased you have David Newton in charge
No-one denies that (we wouldn't exist otherwise)? The term bankrolling is something Trinity fans like yourself should be familiar with - it happened with you under Swann. Swann bankrolled your rise up the table, signing players on inflated wages.
David Newton was in charge of BUFC then - if he was bankrolling us, he'd have prevented players like Jamie Yates and Mark Jones signing for you by offering more money. He didn't.
It is now happening at clubs like North Ferriby, Guiseley and Brackley - it is obvious when clubs have mediocre attendances, yet manage to sign players like Yates, Adam Boyes and Stefan Moore. Our manager had his squad bankrolled at St Neots, at UCL level - similar to Spalding United now.
Why is it difficult for you to grasp the difference between bankrolling, and having losses covered (but decreased)? I'm sure DG asked Newton every week during the season for extra room in the playing budget, yet we still had to keep the squad size pretty constant.