1
The B-Ark / Re: Season Tickets
« on: April 25, 2020, 02:54:52 PM »
i will not apply for a refund on outstanding games
News:
Welcome to Pilgrims Patter
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
The B-Ark / Season Tickets for next Season
« on: March 17, 2020, 10:02:37 AM »
Thing could be tight with the no income coming in over the next few weeks, A number of clubs could go under. so just a suggestion not knowing which League we will be playing in and that our club have not increased season tickets for a number of seasons. So currently no price being released for season tickets. maybe all season ticket holders would pay a deposit now and this may help with a possible cash flow issues that may result from the current situation and pay the balance when THIS CRISIS IS OVER.
3
The B-Ark / Re: Chorley (H)
« on: March 18, 2019, 10:20:56 PM »
can we have a charity boxing match to raise funds for the club...time to grow up
4
The B-Ark / Re: Boston Town
« on: January 16, 2019, 07:19:25 PM »
Pinchbeck only in name, should now change there name to Spalding Town,
5
The B-Ark / Re: Any additions yet?
« on: June 17, 2018, 09:09:57 PM »
more like bull in a china shop...lower league player, poss do well at town
6
The B-Ark / Re: Trinity Relegated
« on: April 21, 2018, 09:57:59 PM »
national league could change next season, guiseley,chester down barrow could also drop
7
The B-Ark / Re: Alan Shearer: Dementia, Football And Me
« on: November 27, 2017, 07:54:16 PM »
Today's football is no lighter than a 30's 40's 50's 60's 70's 80's or 90's the thing was when i rained the old leather ball gained weught
It is a myth that the modern ball is lighter than the balls used in the past.
Since 1937, the dry weight of the ball has been specified by Law 2: 14-16oz. Prior to that, the rules governing the ball’s dry weight specified something lighter – 13-15oz.
This goes for the new ball used in 2010 just as much as it did for the 1966 ball. Whenever you read a comment along the lines of “I’d like to see modern players heading the leather pudding the ’66 boys had to put up with†you can assume that they don’t know what they’re talking about.
What has changed are (1) the material from which the ball is made, and thus the ability of the ball to avoid weight gain during the game through water absorption, and (2) the aerodynamics of the ball i.e. the smoothness of the surface.
The new ball isn’t lighter in of itself – which is what people seem to be assuming: but the new ball won’t get so wet in play. So in the broad sunshine of the ’66 World Cup Final, the famous orange balls were the same weight as the ones we see today. And so it has been on every dry day, on every dry pitch, since the balls were first standardized in the early 1870s.
It is a myth that the modern ball is lighter than the balls used in the past.
Since 1937, the dry weight of the ball has been specified by Law 2: 14-16oz. Prior to that, the rules governing the ball’s dry weight specified something lighter – 13-15oz.
This goes for the new ball used in 2010 just as much as it did for the 1966 ball. Whenever you read a comment along the lines of “I’d like to see modern players heading the leather pudding the ’66 boys had to put up with†you can assume that they don’t know what they’re talking about.
What has changed are (1) the material from which the ball is made, and thus the ability of the ball to avoid weight gain during the game through water absorption, and (2) the aerodynamics of the ball i.e. the smoothness of the surface.
The new ball isn’t lighter in of itself – which is what people seem to be assuming: but the new ball won’t get so wet in play. So in the broad sunshine of the ’66 World Cup Final, the famous orange balls were the same weight as the ones we see today. And so it has been on every dry day, on every dry pitch, since the balls were first standardized in the early 1870s.
8
The B-Ark / Re: Where are they now?
« on: November 11, 2017, 08:51:55 AM »
Graham Potter on football focus today
9
The B-Ark / Re: Murray gone
« on: November 11, 2017, 08:50:04 AM »
Adam Murray assistant manager at guiseley
10
The B-Ark / Re: the window cleaner
« on: November 09, 2017, 09:56:57 AM »
Not a bad shout, should have enough contacts within the non league. who ever gets the job its going to a difficult task i think we will stay in this league, but saying that so did a lot of other teams supporters who's teams have been relegated over the years. Still for me tho Hawley and McGuire
11
The B-Ark / Re: Who will be the Boston Utd new manager
« on: November 05, 2017, 09:25:31 PM »
yes on an hill side, good pub at the end of the road, m62 complete 1976
12
The B-Ark / Re: Who will be the Boston Utd new manager
« on: November 05, 2017, 08:35:03 PM »
Leo Skeete was in the Mossley side that beat us in the FA Trophy semi's in 1980 drawing away 1-1 loosing the 2nd leg 1-2. Bobby Brown scoring both of our goals
13
The B-Ark / Re: Chapman Gone
« on: November 05, 2017, 06:47:03 PM »
Chapman 73 minute sub v Stamford and 79 minute sub Jamie Yates
14
The B-Ark / Re: Who will be the Boston Utd new manager
« on: November 01, 2017, 01:06:38 PM »
give hawley & McGuire a chance for me, Mcguire is leader on the pitch
15
The B-Ark / Re: Dennis Greene
« on: October 29, 2017, 05:48:36 PM »
Time to move on and forward not back and previous mananger/managers surprised Steve Evans not been mentioned
Pages: [1] 2