Messages

61

The B-Ark / Re: Yesterdays line up

« on: February 05, 2017, 11:40:07 AM »

Don't understand your last comment Big M,or who it's aimed at.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, that's why its a forum.
I think most of us enjoy the opportunity to debate and comment on the subjects posted on here.
I think sometimes we all feel a little offended when someone pulls our comment's apart, I do value your opinion's and enjoy reading your comments.

Agreed chubby ,  a complete waste of  time if we all repeat the same opinions .   That's what forums are all about ,  people expressing different opinions .

Every opinion I have you form an problem with. Where did i state everyone has to have the same opinion. If it was such a waste of time why reply

Please translate .

I can have a go at translation. I have a degree in bi-linguistics from the University of Terrace-speak, ie I speak fluent Pilgrim. I think it means... I am fed up, as I don't like your posts, but i don't want to directly say it, just in case its taken on face value, and we argue about it, thus causing a cuffufle on a discussion forum, whilst not attempting to discuss any matters arising, simply suggesting indirectly that discussion is irrelevant as if your opinion isn't agreeable with other posters, therefore pointless in its entirity, so not worth posting.

I'm stupid to masters degree standard hence why my posts are retarded. I have no problem with any ones posts. One person just seems to have a problem with mine.

62

The B-Ark / Re: Yesterdays line up

« on: February 03, 2017, 09:39:23 PM »

Don't understand your last comment Big M,or who it's aimed at.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, that's why its a forum.
I think most of us enjoy the opportunity to debate and comment on the subjects posted on here.
I think sometimes we all feel a little offended when someone pulls our comment's apart, I do value your opinion's and enjoy reading your comments.

Agreed chubby ,  a complete waste of  time if we all repeat the same opinions .   That's what forums are all about ,  people expressing different opinions .

Every opinion I have you form an problem with. Where did i state everyone has to have the same opinion. If it was such a waste of time why reply

63

The B-Ark / Re: Dayle

« on: February 03, 2017, 09:34:30 PM »

I think its a great move for Dayle should hopefully get good supply as Lincoln are flying

64

The B-Ark / Re: Yesterdays line up

« on: February 03, 2017, 03:42:22 PM »

He is a paid employee of BUFC, so should attend training when required.
If every player kept not turning up, the team would be a shambles,AM is right to drop him.
AM is instilling discipline in to this team, much overdue in my opinion.
If these players want to win, they have to know who is boss and toe the line, handwork and discipline brings success, do you think Alex Ferguson would have been successful if he let the players rule the roost.

It's not fair to draw comparisons against Alex Ferguson. His class of 92 for example would have trained for a few hours but then spent the rest of the day on the golf course, playing FIFA or sitting in a hot tub. I bet Beckham, Giggs and Scholes have never had to rush to training straight from completing a shit in a warehouse somewhere. Give Jay a bit of flexibility here, it's not really his fault.

You should know if you don't share the same opinions of select few that opinion doesn't count.
I think it's pathetic personally. So that opinion wont count

65

The B-Ark / Re: Yesterdays line up

« on: February 01, 2017, 05:06:32 PM »

Didnt really like the last line of his interview thoug."We payed the price for jay not attending training". I know one ting id not gove up my job for bufc. Plenty of other clubs out there

66

The B-Ark / Re: Liam Agnew

« on: January 25, 2017, 07:31:58 PM »

Seems like ££££££££££££££ was the reason and who can blame him

67

The B-Ark / Re: Brodie against

« on: January 20, 2017, 05:19:11 PM »

Really folks ??  Under Scott and Hurst even when we had the likes of DD, we still worked the ball around well and didn't just hoof it up top.  Maybe its just me that has noticed the fantastic wing play for instance, or playing it out from the back etc. And i don't think that we can compare the likes of DD to Denton, totally different styles.

It's all about opinions, people read games differently, but i certainly don't think we have been a hoof ball team.  And when we have done this, it ends with the crowd shouting 'keep it down'. 

Each to their own on the opinions though.

I can see your point as far as playing it up to a big man to play off when you are under pressure. Then when able play to your strengths with wing play and hard work in the middle. As we did under Scott and Hurst

68

The B-Ark / Re: Brodie against

« on: January 19, 2017, 02:49:34 PM »

No York street you have to watch him play afor a few mins aswel

69

The B-Ark / Re: Brodie against

« on: January 17, 2017, 04:43:36 PM »

How very dare you Cavalier negativity and agreeing with certain people is what its all about

70

The B-Ark / Re: Good Luck Lincoln City

« on: January 17, 2017, 02:59:56 PM »

I've got my Dipswich shirt at the ready I'd love 10-0

71

The B-Ark / Re: Brodie against

« on: January 17, 2017, 02:58:26 PM »

A couple of years ago, I took my Australian son-in-law to see Everton play. It was a dull game, so to make up for it, I took him to see Southport.

It was a great laugh. A jumped-up nobody playing for Southport embarrassed himself and the home fans by behaving like a total clown. At the merest touch, he continually fell over and complained to the referee. Even his own fans started to barrack him. That may be why he's moved on so much.

Have we really fallen this low? I only hope he's changed his ways, or he'll be gone soon.

His goals say different

72

The B-Ark / Re: Game off

« on: January 16, 2017, 04:01:09 PM »

I have been fighting our corner on their Facebook page,apparently they have done this twice before,and both times they would have had to field weaker teams,funny that!!
They were even suggesting that Boston should compensate Chorley fans.
They even think that we have no chance of reporting them to the FA or league.
This is all a blatant cheating tactic that they have done before.m
But one thing is for sure,their manager has no respect for Chorley fans or anyone else.
A complete and totally self conceited dick.

Just thought I'd come back to you on this - I have seen your messages on the Chorley Facebook page, and it is understandable that you have been influenced by the posts by a Stafford fan.

However I wanted to explain that the club has not done this twice before.  The first match in question was an FA Trophy game where the pitch at Chorley was iced up and we wanted to give as much chance as possible for it to thaw.  Bearing in mind that Stafford is only an hour or so from Chorley, we called for a local ref to come to the ground around lunchtime and he called the game off.  The Stafford fans and players turned up at a similar time to the referee; some 2.5 hours before kick off. 
Knowing the weather conditions, had they planned to set off at a later time, they could have been informed that the game was called off and avoided the travel.

I don't know where the Stafford fan thinks the second example comes from - the rearranged game was set for the following Tuesday evening, and the game was called off mid afternoon as there had been no increase in temperature and the pitch was still icy in the shadow of the main stand.  Stafford was informed and so avoided setting off.

It is ridiculous to suggest that Chorley would call off matches to avoid fielding weaker teams - both by the Stafford fan and by a number of Boston fans.  We have a long term injury to Jason Walker and Sefton Gonzales has left the club.  But we have a fully fit Marcus Carver and also the back up of a member of our Development Squad.  This has been the same for the previous two matches where we beat a good Brackley side at their ground and were narrowly defeated by a rejuvenated Halifax Town away in midweek.  Its not ideal, but one thing the club would not resort to is the 'blatant cheating tactic' which you suggest we have done before

The players were heard saying they did not want to play,ground unfit and not just by one person,quite a few heard it hence the posts about them saying no after Boston AND the TWO referees said it was playable.

Your Club Secretary confirmed in a tweet yesterday that 'We had a local referee pass it at 10.00am.  The match referee arrived at 1.15pm and had issues with one or two patches'
That suggests to be that the match ref had concerns 45 minutes before the Chorley team arrived.
If he had concerns, he should have made a decision there and then.
It is the ref who calls off the game, not either of the managers.

Apparently the pitch was ok with trainers, but once players put their boots on, concerns were raised about the safety of parts of the playing surface.

Catting to the bbc boys they claimed that the ref said Chorley didn't want to play on it. Still he should have told thee tough 

73

The B-Ark / Re: Lamin Colley

« on: January 09, 2017, 08:43:33 PM »

I would think the three most difficult jobs in football management are ...

1.  Unloading unwanted contracted players .
2   Identify a free scoring striker .
3  Managing to sign the said striker .

Lee Shaw of Grantham 14 goals 16 games

Got to be better than what we have now

http://www.granthamtownfc.com/teams/59867/news/football-league-scouts-flocking-to-the-meres-1739407.html

74

The B-Ark / Re: Lamin Colley

« on: January 08, 2017, 07:47:12 PM »

I would think the three most difficult jobs in football management are ...

1.  Unloading unwanted contracted players .
2   Identify a free scoring striker .
3  Managing to sign the said striker .

Lee Shaw of Grantham 14 goals 16 games

75

The B-Ark / Re: Up Front on Saturday

« on: January 06, 2017, 04:07:34 PM »

Wells at Spalding is probably under contract - he's hit the net quite a few times already this season.

Grant Ryan at Stamford put a good shift in for them on Monday against Spalding,.

Luke Shaw or Lee Shaw at Grantham would be a better bet than wells. Players a league higher than Wells. In an average side they are storming it