LEE started the rot ,IMO lee thought he were to good for boston as player and a manager.
again IMO he failed both as a player and manager.
drury failed to sort the mess out,so lets all move on and forget.
Sour grapes miele, why don't you move on! You must have some of Drury's builders dust on your glasses if you can't see how happy the Boston squad is now and, oh yes, they are nearly all Jason Lee's men and still seem to have respect for the man.
if we had kept jason lee in charge, would we be worse or better off than when drury left? i believe we would have been better off with lee in charge than drury. With JL we were always a few players off really competing with drury we seemed like half a team short of winning a game. Under drury we was awful, playing players out of positions, berating them from the off, no wonder the players had no respect for him, these days you've got to earn respect. Granted drury may have brough in a couple of decent signings in lister and watt but he brought in rubbish like smith and walker, yet in his time in charge he got rid of kallum smith (without playing him) and fell out with silk and jelleyman too. unfortunately drurys not the right man for the job