Agree JL and Greenes results pointed to mid-table finish , preferred by most fans to Drurys projected relegation position .
Drury did get rid of a few average players only to replace them with poor players .
In your opinion. Mine? Watt and Lister better than Ward and Stainsfield. Field better than Jelly (as was Mayo).
Foster we had no player of that ilk to compare against - defensive midfielder. But from the departure of Wilson it was obvious we needed someone like him which JL never addressed. I would say he was a success (but correct decision to let go as there are better players that can do that job)
Walker poor and worse than Silk, I'll give you that one. Smith, had good and bad games like all wingers - seems he was vilified for it more than others. Was better than Stokes but worse than Kallum Smith. Spriggs was a waste of space I'll give you that too.
So IMO about a 50/50 split.
As far as Drury's concerned? Personally I think Drury would have turned it round but we'll never know now.
Anway I will support whoever wears the shirt and the manager, it's nothing personal against any players retained just think the squad as a whole have had long enough to prove themselves here and perhaps it's time for some to find a new challenge. But this is the place to voice opinions and concerned and I'm very concerned. In the immortal words of N40's - prove me wrong